The Constitutionalisation of the Process

Authors

  • Antonio María Lorca Navarrete Universidad de Granada

    Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad de Granada (España). Doctor en Derecho de la Università degli Studi di Bologna
    (Italia). Catedrático de Derecho Procesal de la Universidad del País Vasco (España).

Keywords:

Process, Procedural Law, Constitution, Peruvian Litigation Model, Truth, Justice, Due Process, Jurisdictional Function

Abstract

This article addresses the relationship between the Process and the Constitution. For this purpose, it is explained what is the object of study of the Procedural Law, and which is the litigation model adopted in article 139 of the Peruvian Constitution, why this model is about a system with its own autonomy and substantivity and not about a subsystem, and how Civil Law and Common Law converging in this model. Furthermore, the author establishes, based on the Constitution, the reason why the existing procedural guarantees in our legal system do not imply a “right to a right decision”, but only the right to a fair process, and explains the difference between “fair process” and “justice” or “judicial truth”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-02-07

How to Cite

Lorca Navarrete, A. M. (2016). The Constitutionalisation of the Process. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(52), 290–297. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/16388

Issue

Section

Artículos