Institutional approach of IHL and IHRL: current trends in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights

Authors

  • Elizabeth Salmón Gárate Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Profesora de Derecho Internacional Público en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Directora del Instituto Democracia y de Derechos Humanos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

Keywords:

International Human Rights Law, International Humanitarian Law, Inter American Court of Human Rights, Lex specialis

Abstract

Recently, the interaction between International Human Rights Law (IHRL) and International Humanitarian Law (IHL) has been significantly developed by the jurisprudence of the Inter- American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR). This article analyzes this recent trend from the cases of the Santo Domingo Massacre
and Afro communities displaced from the Cacarica River Basin (Operation Genesis) of this tribunal to assert its competence not only to use IHL to interpret the Inter-American human rights instruments but, at the same time, to approach a direct use of humanitarian standards, which creates a gray area between the interpretation and application of such area of Law. In doing so, the Court resorts to the lex specialis if the IHL norm is the most specialized for the case, and uses IHL to a limited extent, only to expand the content of human rights, but not to judge on possible violations of IHL, which results in a methodology of pick and choose of IHL provisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-02-07

How to Cite

Salmón Gárate, E. (2016). Institutional approach of IHL and IHRL: current trends in the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(52), 330–354. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/16391

Issue

Section

Artículos