Consumer protection and State proposal in private self-regulation and administrative procedures: an initial approach

Authors

  • Moisés Rejanovinschi Talledo Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Magíster en Derecho de la Propiedad Intelectual y de la Competencia por la misma casa de estudios. Docente PUCP en la Maestría de Derecho Propiedad Intelectual y de la Competencia, en la Facultad de Derecho y en el Programa de Segunda Especialidad de Protección al Consumidor. Docente de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Continental. Asesor en temas de Derecho de la Competencia y Propiedad Intelectual.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.015

Keywords:

Franchise, Self-Regulation, Withdrawal, Out of Court Settlement, Consumer, Arbitration, Consumer Protection, Indecopi, Social Network, Facebook

Abstract

Are State proposals on private self-regulation and administrative procedures on consumption adequate? The present papper analyzes the challenges of its application, providing a final reflection on the complaints in social networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-13

How to Cite

Rejanovinschi Talledo, M. (2017). Consumer protection and State proposal in private self-regulation and administrative procedures: an initial approach. IUS ET VERITAS, (54), 272–293. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.015

Issue

No. 54 (2017)

Section

Main Section

License

Copyright (c) 2017 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.