Problematic areas in the real property subjects to a fiduciary domain: sales tax treatment and the provisionary measures

Authors

  • Julio Pozo Sánchez Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

    Abogado por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, con Título de Post Grado de Especialización en Estrategias de Negociación por la Universidad de Castilla – La Mancha (España). Se ha desempeñado como profesor de Derechos Reales en la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Asesor Principal & Fundador del Grupo de Estudios de Derecho Inmobiliario-GEDI. Consultor en temas de Juntas de Propietarios y litigios inmobiliarios. 

  • Carolina Ormeño Flores Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos

    Egresada de la carrera de Derecho por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Sub Coordinadora del Grupo de Estudios de Derecho Inmobiliario-GEDI.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201703.001

Keywords:

Escrow Agreement, Fiduciary Domain, Excise, Third Party Property Exclusion, Foreclosures on Real Estate, Trustor, Trustee

Abstract

According to Peruvian legislation, through an escrow agreement a trustor transfers under a fiduciary domain in favor of an escrow agent various goods, rights and obligations, which must achieve certain purpose. These will constitute an autonomous patrimony that does not respond any obligation of the trustor and the agent escrow. Despite the clarity of this statement, the authors reveal that indeed there might be different interpretations about this agreement that have practical consequences with the treatment of real properties subject to fiduciary dominion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-04-04

How to Cite

Pozo Sánchez, J., & Ormeño Flores, C. (2017). Problematic areas in the real property subjects to a fiduciary domain: sales tax treatment and the provisionary measures. IUS ET VERITAS, (55), 16–28. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201703.001

Issue

Section

Main Section