The Necessity of Convergence in Private Law

Authors

  • Richard A. Epstein New York University

    Profesor de Derecho Laurence A. Tisch en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Nueva York, Catedrático Emérito Peter and Kirsten Bedford en el Hoover Institution, y Profesor de Derecho Emérito por Servicio Distinguido James Parker Hall y Profesor Principal en la Universidad de Chicago.

Keywords:

Private Law, Natural Law, Civil Law, Convergence, Natural reason

Abstract

This article describes the discussion between Gaius and Hume regarding the correct definition of “natural law”. It concludes that all rules that regulate man, through which he has formed not only the Civil Law of each State but also the Law of Nations, are always conventional, being the correct natural laws only those that have not had any intervention by man for their creation but exist by themselves: physics, chemistry, and biology. Once this is defined, the investigation presents the conditions under which Private Law, which regulates the daily activities of the human being and has been created gradually by the conduct of ordinary actions and without the intervention of a superior being, needs to converge with these natural laws, which are immovable, non-transferable, and invariable. The conditions will be applied to the institutions of Private Law that are part of the universal features shared by all human beings as the essence of their existence: marriage, force, property, damage, and contract.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-09-17

How to Cite

Epstein, R. A. (2020). The Necessity of Convergence in Private Law. IUS ET VERITAS, (60), 122–132. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/22717

Issue

Section

Main Section