The strike for economic reasons and labor economic arbitration: trails that diverge, intertwine and oppose

Authors

  • César Gonzáles Hunt Philippi Prietocarrioza Ferrero DU & Uría

    Abogado y Magíster en Derecho de Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Maestría en Estudios Avanzados de la Seguridad Social por la Universidad Pablo Olavide de Sevilla. Profesor de la Maestría de Derecho de Trabajo y de la Seguridad Social de la Pontifica Universidad Católica del Perú. Contacto: cesar.gonzales@ppulegal.com.

  • Luis Mendoza Legoas Philippi Prietocarrioza Ferrero DU & Uría

    Magíster en Relaciones Industriales y Relaciones de Empleo por la Universidad de Turín y el Centro Internacional de Formación de la OIT. Profesor de Derecho del Trabajo en el posgrado de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Asociado del área Laboral en Philippi Prietocarrizosa Ferrero DU & Uría. Contacto: luis.mendoza@ppulegal.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.009

Keywords:

Strike, Arbitration, Economic conflict, Labor union, Collective Employment Law

Abstract

Two mechanisms, covered by legality and widely used in conflicts of economic origin between employers and labor unions (such as arbitration and strikes), have a complex relationship. Here we propose a review of essential and incidental elements that configure both mechanisms for their legal-economic utility in union conflicts. To meet this purpose, we propose a review of relevant aspects of the pragmatics of strike and arbitration, comparing their similarities and differences, to recognize in them the institutions whose existence in economic conflicts surpasses any design or interpretation that intends to constrain it as a simple static or sequential resource.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-09-17

How to Cite

Gonzáles Hunt, C., & Mendoza Legoas, L. (2020). The strike for economic reasons and labor economic arbitration: trails that diverge, intertwine and oppose. IUS ET VERITAS, (60), 188–196. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202001.009

Issue

Section

Main Section