A metaethically based position on abortion and the concept of human dignity

Authors

  • Rafael Horacio Molina Castillo Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9780-3023

    Bachiller en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Candidato a LL.M. en Principios del Derecho Alemán con especialidad en Filosofía del Derecho en la Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München. Miembro extraordinario de IUS ET VERITAS y ex Director de Investigación durante el semestre 2015-1. Correo electrónico: rafael. molina@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.013

Keywords:

Discourse theory, Abortion, Dignity, Theory of capacities, Postmodernism, Skepticism, Rationality, Kant, Alexy

Abstract

A common problem in moral discourse is the risk of incurring in infinite regressions. This, together with other criticisms also directed at scientific disciplines, motivated the sceptical attitude towards morality advised by several postmodern theories. The response of both moral philosophy and science was similar: to reaffirm the possibility of reaching agreements of “truth” or “correction” through rational discussion, which in turn implies a regulated procedure to submit theories to questioning in the freest possible way. In this paper the author intends to delineate some elements of rational discourse that are characteristically used in practical discourse, and then apply them to a discussion of abortion. The central purpose of this research consists in contributing to the analysis of the justifiability of the idea that the fetus can have dignity. This discussion implies first identifying a theory of dignity that appropriately satisfies the demand for universality of all rational discourse, and then applying it to some of the usual arguments in the abortion debate.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Molina Castillo, R. H. (2020). A metaethically based position on abortion and the concept of human dignity. IUS ET VERITAS, (61), 206–226. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.013

Issue

Section

Artículos