Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC): preliminary analysis regarding a possible extension

Authors

  • Sol Ivanna Aragón Samanez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3145-047X

    Alumna de octavo ciclo en la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Asistente de Cátedra del curso de Instituciones del Derecho Privado 2 en la misma casa de estudios. Miembro ordinaria de IUS ET VERITAS. Correo electrónico: aragon.sol@pucp.edu.pe

  • Nicole Alexandra Sierra Roque Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4594-514X

    Alumna de octavo ciclo en la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Miembro ordinaria de IUS ET VERITAS. Correo electrónico: a20171971@pucp.edu.pe

  • Milagros Alexandra Condezo Trinidad Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8059-5216

    Alumna de octavo ciclo en la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Miembro ordinaria de IUS ET VERITAS. Correo electrónico: mcondezo@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.017

Keywords:

Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC), The Peruvian insolvency system, Credit, Liquidity, Company, COVID-19, Bankruptcy Law, Civil Law

Abstract

The arrival of the Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC for its initials in spanish) was not fortuitous. In order to face the global health crisis, the Peruvian government not only has been taking exceptional actions related to the sanitary system, but also has been concerned about the businesses affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Likewise, this procedure has been created as a complementary action, with the purpose of refinancing the obligations of the companies that suffered the effects of the pandemic. Furthermore, as the first entirely virtual fast- track procedure, and also because of its development in a shorter time compared to the other existing procedures in Perú, the PARC is unique.
Due to these advantages, this article will try to explain why the PARC should not only be valid until December 31st, 2020. The continuity of this procedure in the post-pandemic stage is necessary, since the economic crisis will doubtlessly have long-term effects. Nonetheless, different questions arise regarding the permanence of this procedure in our legal system. Among these, the main questions are related to the similarity of the PARC with the Preventive Bankruptcy Procedure and also some administrative “flaws”. This will be analyzed throughout the text.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-23

How to Cite

Aragón Samanez, S. I., Sierra Roque, N. A., & Condezo Trinidad, M. A. (2020). Fast-Track Insolvency Refinancing Procedure (PARC): preliminary analysis regarding a possible extension. IUS ET VERITAS, (61), 286–304. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202002.017

Issue

Section

Artículos