The reasons why the Public-Private Partnership contracts regime should be preferred to Government-to-Government (G2G) agreements in Peru

Authors

  • Humberto Sheput Stucchi Universidad del Pacífico https://orcid.org/0009-0006-1939-3184

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (Lima, Perú). Máster en Economía y Regulación de Servicios Públicos de Red por la Universidad de Barcelona. Profesor de la Maestría de Regulación de la Universidad del Pacífico. Profesor de la Dirección de Educación Continua de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
    Correo electrónico: sheput100@yahoo.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.007

Keywords:

Peru, Public Politics, Infrastructure Works, Government-to-Government Agreements, Public-Private Partnership Contracts

Abstract

The success attained in the development of the essential infrastructure for the XVIII Pan American Games and the Sixth Parapan American Games of Lima 2019 has demonstrated a distinct shift in the approach embraced by the Peruvian State in the execution of infrastructure ventures. The utilization of public-private partnership contracts has been relinquished in favor of government-to-government agreements.
Is the idea or alternative of prioritizing Government-to-Government agreements as the initial option the most suitable or advantageous for the Peruvian State? In this article, we will assess the benefits and drawbacks of both approaches and propose criteria to evaluate which scheme would be the most favorable depending on the nature of the project or infrastructure to be undertaken.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

Sheput Stucchi, H. (2023). The reasons why the Public-Private Partnership contracts regime should be preferred to Government-to-Government (G2G) agreements in Peru. IUS ET VERITAS, (66), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.007