Evidentiary errors in tax law

Authors

  • César Alejandro Dávila Alvarado CMS Grau https://orcid.org/0009-0005-0839-6809

    Abogado por la Universidad de Piura (Piura, Perú). Maestrando del programa “Global Rule of Law & Constitutional Democracy” por la Universidad de Génova.
    Correo electrónico: mdabogados.cdavila@gmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.015

Keywords:

Evidence, Evidentiary reasoning, Assessment of evidence, Standard of proof, Burden of proof, Evidentiary errors

Abstract

The aims of this paper are: (i) at a conceptual level, to present a typology (not exhaustive) of evidentiary errors that usually occur in tax proceedings and processes in Peru, grouped according to the stages of the evidentiary activity where they occur, and to propose a terminological apparatus to describe with greater explanatory power what happens when a decision is made on the factual premise in tax proceedings and processes. Similarly, (ii) with regards to the dogmatic dimension, an examination shall be undertaken to scrutinize the legal ramifications ensuing from these errors, in strict accordance with the prevailing legal framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

Dávila Alvarado, C. A. (2023). Evidentiary errors in tax law. IUS ET VERITAS, (66), 236–257. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.015

Issue

Section

General Section