Adaptation of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) for Argentinean population

Authors

  • Maria Elena Brenlla Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina
    Licenciada en Psicología. Profesora de la Facultad de Psicología y Educación, e Investigadora principal del Observatorio de la Deuda Social Argentina, UCA. Investigadora FONCYT-PICT 2004. Contacto: Av. Alicia M. de Justo 1500, 4º piso (C1107AAZ), Buenos Aires. 
    bren@uca.edu.ar
  • María Aranguren Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina

    Licenciada en Psicología. Profesora de la Facultad de Psicología y Educación, y Becaria del Centro de Investigaciones en Psicología y Psicopedagogía (CIPP), UCA. Contacto: Av. Alicia M. de Justo 1600, Planta Baja (C1107AZ), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
    maria_aranguren@uca.edu.ar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201002.005

Keywords:

Psychological distress, screening scale, psychometric properties

Abstract

The aim of this study was to adapt the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) for Argentinean population. We conducted a linguistic adaptation of the instrument and an analysis of its psychometric properties. To assess the reliability of the scale, analysis of internal consis- tency was made through Cronbach’s alpha and temporal stability of the items was examined in two different subsamples. In addition, the scale’s validity was assessed, taking into account convergent validity, criterion validity by contrasting groups and factorial composition of the K10. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was carried out to assess sensitivity, specificity and the area under the curve (AUC). The results of the present study indicate that the K10 is an adequate instrument presenting strong psychometric properties for screeningpsychological distress in our environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2010-03-27

How to Cite

Brenlla, M. E., & Aranguren, M. (2010). Adaptation of the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) for Argentinean population. Revista De Psicología, 28(2), 308–340. https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.201002.005

Issue

Section

Articles