For an Animistic Camera: A Symbiotic Manifesto for Sensory and Affective Documentary
Abstract
This article plays with the format of the artist manifesto in order to propose a new understanding about the relationship between body and camera in contemporary sensory and affective documentary. The stories we tell ourselves about technology influence how we use it, the narratives we create with it, and how we produce meaning in film. Following the call to develop new perspectives in our Anthropocenic times that will allow us to narrate new stories about ourselves and our others (humans, non-humans, more-than-humans) and to the need of imagining new futures beyond capitalism; this manifesto emphasizes the importance of re-conceptualizing the understanding of the relationship we have with the mechanical body of the camera. Here, I propose to see this interaction of bodies from an animistic or symbiotic perspective, where technology is not just a disposable tool destined to exclusively reproduce a human will. This animistic or symbiotic camera emerges from a dialogue with earlier proposals that marked key trajectories in the history of documentary and ethnographic cinema. The manifestos of Dziga Vertov, Jean Rouch and Maya Deren formulate a relationship between a body and an active camera, that is alive, has a soul, and allows us to tell stories about complex sensible worlds beyond sight. Their proposals present a critical vision of a relationship to technology necessary to create new representations about reality that can responds to changing socio-political contexts. We seek to promote and re-think the production of a documentary cinema that emerges from our interaction with a vibrant camera, generated and generative, to develop narratives that embody us and evoke the intuitive, flexible and porous reality of the world we live in.
References
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bird Rose, D. (2009). Dingo Makes us Human: Life and Land in an Australian Aboriginal Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Castaing-Taylor, L. y Paravel, V. (2012). Leviathan. USA, UK, France: Arrête ton Cinéma, Harvard Sensory Ethnography Lab y Le Bureau.
Deren, M. (2005). Essential Deren: Collected Writings on Film. Documentext.
Deren, M. (1980). From the Notebook of Maya Deren, 1947. October 14 (Autumn 1980), 21–46.
Eisenstein, S. y Leyda, Jay. (1977) Film Form. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment: Essays on Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. London: Routledge.
Mirzoeff, N. (2014). Visualizing the Anthropocene. Public Culture 26(2), 213-232.
Rouch, J. (1974). The Camera and Man 1 (1), 37-44. Recuperado de https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol1/iss1/6 Sniadecki, J.P. (2014). The Iron Ministry. USA: Cinder Films.
Strathern, M. (1990). The Gender of the Gift:Problems with Women and Problems with Society in Melanesia. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Tsai, Y.L, Carbonell, I., Chevrier, J. y Tsing, A. (2016). Golden Snail Opera: The More-than-Human Performance of Friendly Farming on Taiwan’s Lanyang Plain. Cultural Anthropology 31(4), 520-544. Recuperado de https://doi.org/10.14506/ca31.4.04
Tsing, A. (2015). The Mushroom at the End of the World: On the Possibility of Life in Capitalist Ruins. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vertov, D. (1922). “We: Variant of a Manifesto”. En Scott MacKenzie (Ed,) (2004), Film Manifestos and Global Cinema Cultures: A Critical Anthology (pp. 23-26). Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
Downloads
Copyright (c) 2018 Conexión
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.