Apogeo y declive del derecho constitucional a un juicio por jurado para causas penales en los Estados Unidos

  • José Arrieta Caro University of Minnesota
    Candidato a Master of Law Program (LL.M), University of Minnesota. Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 
    Código ORCID: 0000-0002-9518-1662. Correo electrónico: arrie013@umn.edu
Palabras clave: juicio por jurado, negociación de condena, historia del jurado, reglas de funcionamiento del jurado, acuerdos negociados de condena


Desde su aparición en Europa, el juicio por jurados tuvo que recorrer un largo camino para convertirse en el método oficial de juzgamiento de casos penales en los Estados Unidos. A pesar de que no fue creado exactamente con esa finalidad, tuvo varios momentos memorables durante su desarrollo que le otorgaron el prestigio y valor necesarios para insertarse en la Constitución de ese país como una garantía frente al abuso del poder. Hoy, sin embargo, la gran importancia que alguna vez tuvo ha quedado atrás. Las necesidades y prácticas propias de un sistema con una altísima tasa de condenas han terminado por relegarlo, convirtiéndolo en una verdadera especie en peligro de extinción. El siguiente artículo describe y explica el nacimiento y auge de los juicios por jurados para causas penales y su posterior virtual desaparición a manos de los no tan eficientes como peligrosos acuerdos negociados de condena.

Referencias bibliográficas

Adams, A. M. (1993). William Penn and the American heritage of religious liberty. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 137(4), 516-523. Recuperado de http://www.jstor.org/stable/987070

Alschuler, A.& Deiss, A. G. (1994). A brief history of the criminal jury in the United States. University of Chicago Law Review, 61, 867-928. doi: 10.2307/1600170

Apple, J.& Deyling, R. (1995). A primer on the civil-law system. Washington, D.C.: Federal Judicial Center. Recuperado de https://www.fjc.gov/content/primer-civillaw-system-0

Appleman, L. (2009). The lost meaning of the jury trial right. Indiana Law Journal, 84(2), 397-446. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1084960

Arnette, J. M. (1968). Jury trial in Louisiana: Implications of Duncan. Louisiana Law Review, 29(1), 118-130. Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol29/iss1/8

Ballew v. Georgia, 435 U.S. 223 (1978).

Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986).

Blume, J. H. & Helm, R. K. (2014). The unexonerated: Factually innocent defendants who plead guilty. Cornell Law Faculty Working Papers, 113. Recuperado de http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clsops_papers/113

Bordenkircher v. Hayes, 434 U.S. 357 (1978).

Brady v. United States, 397 U.S. 742 (1970).

Burnham, W. (2016). Introduction to the law and legal system of the United States (6taed.).Saint Paul, MN: West Academic.

Butler, P. (1995). Racially based jury nullification: Black power in the criminal justice system. Yale Law Journal, 105(3), 677-725. doi: 10.2307/797197

Cleveland, L. (2015, 30 de junio). Glenn Ford, exonerated after 30 years on death row, dies. CNN. Recuperado de http://www.cnn.com/2015/06/30/us/exonerateddeath-row-inmate-glenn-ford-dies/

Dainow, J. (1966). The Civil Law and the Common Law: Some points of comparison. American Journal of Comparative Law, 15(3), 419-435. doi: 10.2307/838275

December 1, 2016. Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank, 574 U.S. 370 (1996).

Duncan v. State of Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968). Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure [Fed. R. Crim. P.], as amended through

Findlater, J. E. (1981). Retrial after a hung jury: The double jeopardy problem. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 129(3), 701-737. doi: 10.2307/3311743

Fisher, G. (2003). Plea bargaining’s triumph: A history of plea bargaining in America. Standford: Standford University Press.

Gobert, J. J. (1988). In search of the impartial jury. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 79(2), 269-327. doi: 10.2307/1143469

Gordon, S. G. (2014). What jurors want to know: Motivating juror cognition to increase legal knowledge & improve decision making. Tennessee Law Review, 81, 751-793. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2308593

Graham, H.J. (1938). The «conspiracy theory» of the fourteenth amendment: 2.Yale Law Journal, 47(3), 371-403. doi: 10.2307/791947

Graham, K. (2014). Overcharging. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 11(1), 701-724. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2227193

Hessick, F. A. & Saujani, R. (2002). Plea Bargaining and Convicting the Innocent: The Role of the Prosecutor, the Defense Counsel and the Judge. Brighman Young University Journal of Public Law,16(4), 189-242. Recuperado de https://ssrn.com/abstract=1443997

Israel, J. H., Kamisar, Y., LaFave, W. R., King, N. J. & Primus, E. B. (2016). Criminal procedure and the Constitution: Leading Supreme Court cases and introductory text. Saint Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.

Jamestown Colony [video]. (2010). History.com. Recuperado de http://www.history.com/topics/Jamestown

J.E.B v. Alabama ex rel T.B., 511 U.S. 127 (1994).

Jury. (s. f.). En Merriam-Webster.com. Recuperado de http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jury

Kaplan, J., Weisberg, R. & Binder, G. (2016). Criminal Law: Cases and materials (8va ed.). Nueva York: Wolters Kluwer.

Knight, A. H. (1996). The life of the law. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.

LaFave, W.R., Israel, J. H., King, N. J. & Kerr, O. S. (2015). Determining factual basis of plea. En Criminal procedure (4ta ed., vol. 5, § 21.4(f), pp. 1005-1024). Nueva York: Westlaw.

Langbein, J. (1973). The origins of public prosecution at Common Law. The American Journal of Legal History, 17, 313-335. doi: 10.2307/845098

Lappi-Seppälä, T. (2011). Explaining imprisonment in Europe. European Journal of Criminology, 8(4), 303-328. doi: 10.1177/1477370811411459

Laster, K. (2001). Law as culture (2da ed.). Sydney: The Federation Press.

Leipold, A. (1995). Why Grand Juries do not (and cannot) protect the accused. Cornell Law Review, 80(2), 260-324. Recuperado de http://scholarship.law.cornell.edu/clr/vol80/iss2/10

Lempert, R. (2015). The American jury system: A synthetic overview. Chicago Kent-Law Review, 90(3), 825-859. Recuperado de http://scholarship.kentlaw.iit.edu/cklawreview/vol90/iss3/4

Linder, D. (2001). The trial of John Peter Zenger: An account. doi: 10.2139/ ssrn.1021258

Loh, W. D. (1984). Social research in the judicial process: Cases, readings and text. Nueva York: Russel Sage Foundation.

Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370 (1996).

Maryland Rules [Md. R.] [reglas de procedimiento de la corte de Maryland, Estados Unidos].

McSweeney, Th. J. (2014). Magna Carta and the right to trial by jury. Faculty Publications, 1722, 138-157. Recuperado de http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1722

Minow, N. (1949). Some legal aspects of the Hiss case. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 40(3), 344-353. doi: 10.2307/1138547

Mize, G. E., Hannaford-Agor, P. & Waters, N. L. (2007, abril). The State-ofthe-States survey of jury improvement efforts: A compendium report. National Center for State Courts, State Justice Institute. Recuperado de http://www.ncscjurystudies.org/~/media/Microsites/Files/CJS/SOS/SOSCompendiumFinal.ashx

Motivans, M. (2015a, enero). Federal Justice Statistics, 2011-Statistical Tables, NCJ 248469. U.S. Departament of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Recuperado de https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fjs11st.pdf

Motivans, M. (2015b, enero). Federal Justice Statistics, 2012-Statistical Tables, NCJ 248470. U.S. Departamentof Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Recuperado de https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/fjs12st.pdf

Pager, D. (2007). Marked: Race, crime and finding work in an era of mass incarceration. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Pepper, D. A. (2000). Nullifying history: Modern-Day misuse of the right to decide the law. Case Western Reserve Law Review, 50, 599-643. Recuperado de http://scholarlycommons.law.case.edu/caselrev/vol50/iss3/4

Plucknett, Th.F. T. (2001). A concise history of the Common Law (5.a ed.). Nueva Jersey: The Lawbook Exchange.

Rakoff, J. S. (2014, 20 de noviembre). Why innocent people plead guilty. The New York Review of Books.Recuperado de http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/11/20/why-innocent-people-plead-guilty/

Robin, G. D. (2007). The Grand Jury: Historical roots, contemporary operations and calls for reform. Professional Issues in Criminal Justice, 2(2), 125-144. Recuperado de http://www.picj.org/vol2_2.aspx

Schneider, S. (2013). When innocent defendants falsely confess: Analyzing the ramifications of entering Alford pleas in context of the burgeoning innocence movement. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 103(1), 279-308. Recuperado de http://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol103/iss1/6

Slovenko, R. (1957). The jury system in Louisiana criminal law. Louisiana Law Review 17(4), 655-729. Recuperado de http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/lalrev/vol17/iss4/2

Sparf and Hansen v. United States, 156 U.S. 51 (1895).

Taylor v. Louisiana, 419 U.S. 522 (1975).

The civil rights movement and the second reconstruction, 1945-1968. (2008). History, Art & Archives, U.S. House of Representatives, Office of the Historian, Black Americans in Congress, 1870–2007.Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. Recuperado de http://history.house.gov/Exhibitions-and-Publications/BAIC/Historical-Essays/Keeping-the-Faith/Civil-Rights-Movement/

Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co., 328 U.S. 217 (1946).

Tonry, M. (1999). Why are U.S. incarceration rates so high?Crime & Delinquency, 45(4), 419-437. doi: 10.1177/0011128799045004001

Trocino, C. J. (2016). You can’t handle the truth: A primer on false confessions. University of Miami Race and Social Law Review, 6(1), 85-100. Recuperado de http://repository.law.miami.edu/umrsjlr/vol6/iss1/6

United States Constitution, [U.S. Const.] [Constitución, Estados Unidos]. United States v. Gaudin, 515 U.S. 506 (1995).

United States v. Torres-Vazquez, 731 F.3d41 (1st Cir.2013).

United States v. United States Gypsum Co., 333 U.S. 364 (1948).

Van Caenegem, R.C. (1988). The birth of the English Common Law (2da ed.). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Van Caenegem, R.C. (1991). Legal history: A European perspective. Londres: The Hambledon Press.

Von Moschzisker, R. (1921). The historic origin of trial by jury. University of Pennsylvania Law Review and American Law Register, 70(1), 1-13. doi: 10.2307/3314114

Wan, T. (2007). The unnecessary evil of plea bargaining: An unconstitutional conditions problem and a not-so-least restrictive alternative. Southern California Review of Law and Social Justice, 17(1), 33-61. Recuperado de http://gould.usc.edu/students/journals/rlsj/issues/assets/docs/issue_17/07_Wan_Macro.pdf

Ward, B. (2003). Plea best not taken: Why criminal defendants should avoid the Alford plea, A. Missouri Law Review, 68(4), 913-943. Recuperado de http://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol68/iss4/4

Watch a former prosecutor apologize for sending an innocent man to death row [video]. (2016, 04 de febrero). Fusion. Recuperado de https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rmxASoca1P8

Weiser, B. (2016, 07 de agosto). Trial by jury, a hallowed American right, is vanishing. The New York Times (N.Y. / Region). Recuperado de http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/08/nyregion/jury-trials-vanish-and-justice-is-servedbehind-closed-doors.html?_r=0

Williams v. Florida, 399 U.S. 78 (1970).

Worrall, J. (2008). The changing role of the American prosecutor. Nueva York: State University of New York, New York.


El artículo aún no registra descargas.
Cómo citar
Arrieta Caro, J. (2017). Apogeo y declive del derecho constitucional a un juicio por jurado para causas penales en los Estados Unidos. Derecho PUCP, (78), 129-169. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201701.006