Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial for Criminal Cases in the United States

Authors

  • José Arrieta Caro University of Minnesota https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9518-1662
    Candidato a Master of Law Program (LL.M), University of Minnesota. Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. 
    Código ORCID: 0000-0002-9518-1662. Correo electrónico: arrie013@umn.edu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201701.006

Keywords:

jury trial, plea bargaining, history of the jury, rules of the jury trial, guilty pleas

Abstract

Since its appearance in Europe, the trial by jury had to travel a long path until it became the official procedure to try criminal cases in the United States. Although it was not really created with that specific purpose, over the years it experienced memorable moments in which it was granted with the prestige and value required to be inserted in the Constitution of that country, as a safeguard against the arbitrariness of the governmental power. Today, however, the great importance that it had in the past has significantly decreased. The needs and practices of a system with a particularly high rate of convictions have relegated and transformed it into a real endangered specie. The following article describes and explains its birth and rise, as well as its subsequent virtual disappearance due to the not so efficient as dangerous guilty pleas.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-06-15

How to Cite

Arrieta Caro, J. (2017). Rise and Fall of the Constitutional Right to a Jury Trial for Criminal Cases in the United States. Derecho PUCP, (78), 129–169. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201701.006

Issue

Section

Main Section