The law in The Brothers Karamazov

Authors

  • Lorenzo Zolezzi Ibárcena Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7614-1852

    Doctor en Derecho y actualmente profesor principal del Departamento de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Ha sido decano y jefe del Departamento de Derecho de la PUCP, así como presidente de la Academia Peruana de Derecho, Académico visitante en las Universidades de Wisconsin y Stanford en EE.UU. y profesor visitante en la Universidad Central de Venezuela. Correo electrónico: lzolezz@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201501.019

Keywords:

active love or love all-encompassing, general guilt, freewill, starets, legend of the Grand Inquisitor, instruction of the summary, jury trial, conviction of an innocent, the paradigm of the modern criminal procedure

Abstract

The Brothers Karamazov was the last novel of Dostoievski and for that reason is in way a sort of synthesis of his thinking. In the article there is a brief development of some key ideas as these: in matter of guilt, the attitude has more importance than action; everyone is guilty of everything before the eyes of everyone (universal guilt); suffering purifies the individual and acts as a remedy that promotes his spiritual elevation; freewill is central in human existence. But the novel is also a novel about a crime. Somebody is murdered and the readers will discover the perpetrator at the very end. 25% of the novel is devoted to technical legal matters: the instruction of the summary and the court trial. But what is most interesting is that an innocent is found guilty, because law had no other choice having into account the facts that are backed by evidence. It would be possible to find him not guilty, but for doing so it would be necessary to change the paradigm that is the backbone of modern criminal law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-06-01

How to Cite

Zolezzi Ibárcena, L. (2015). The law in The Brothers Karamazov. Derecho PUCP, (74), 355–395. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201501.019