Justiciability of regressive measures of social rights. Some reflections about their judicial protection in Latin America

Authors

  • Natalia Torres Zuñiga Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0541-1082

    Abogada  por  la  Pontificia  Universidad  Católica  del  Perú,  estudiante  del  Máster  en  DerechoConstitucional (2013-2014) de la Universidad Internacional Menéndez Pelayo y el Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, Madrid. Correo electrónico: n.torres@pucp.pe. Ponencia presentada en el IX Congreso Mundial de la Asociación Internacional de Derecho Constitucional (Oslo, Noruega, 16-20 de junio de 2014) bajo el título «Justiciability of regressive measures of social rights. Some reflections about their judicial protection in Latin America» en la mesa Workshop on Social RightsGroup.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201502.005

Keywords:

Social rights, non regression principle, justiciability, weak courts, strong courts, proportionality test, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Constitutional Courts

Abstract

This  article  has  as  aim  to  reflect  about  the  protection  of economic, social and cultural rights before the regressive measures adopted by governments in Latin America, as well as of the different levels of jurisdictional tutelage that those receive. The document develops the concept of a regressive measure and the scope of the non-regression principle, furthermore, it shows the experience of the Constitutional Courts from Peru and Colombia and the organs of the Interamerican System of Human Rights regarding the protection of social rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-11-01

How to Cite

Torres Zuñiga, N. (2015). Justiciability of regressive measures of social rights. Some reflections about their judicial protection in Latin America. Derecho PUCP, (75), 95–117. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201502.005