Collective bargaining in Peru: the hyper-decentralization and its many drawbacks

Authors

  • Alfredo Villavicencio Ríos Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5364-9861

    Decano de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y doctor en Derechopor la Universidad de Sevilla. Correo electrónico: alfredo.villavicencio@pucp.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201502.015

Keywords:

Collective bargaining, bargaining structure, obligation to guarantee and promotion, coverage and effectiveness of collective protection

Abstract

In Latin America, most countries have a decentralized bargainingstructure that is in the company’s main area of negotiation and different from the warranty obligations and promotion deriving from the new Latin American constitutionalism emerged after the fall of dictatorships in the last quarter of the past century. In Peru, the legislative option enforces a hyper- decentralized model that has restricted maximum coverage and effectiveness of the collective protection. Therefore, the state regulation referred to the articulated collective bargaining is not complete because it ignores issues such as the legal nature of the instruments of juncture, the framework agreements, their effectiveness, etc.
The weakness of the collective protection has transcended the specific field of business and questions the social, economic and political balances that underpin the constitutional rule of law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-11-01

How to Cite

Villavicencio Ríos, A. (2015). Collective bargaining in Peru: the hyper-decentralization and its many drawbacks. Derecho PUCP, (75), 333–353. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201502.015