Nulla executio sine titulo: the scrutiny of awards in the practice of international arbitration as a mechanism to optimize the enforcement of awards in Peru

Authors

  • José Domingo Rivarola Reisz Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4557-3027

    Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, área de solución de controversias, arbitraje y prueba.
  • Fabio Núñez del Prado Chaves Universidad Carlos III de Madrid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-6561

    Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas y Universidad ESAN.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201701.004

Keywords:

party autonomy, international arbitration, International Chamber of Commerce, effectiveness, enforcement, scrutiny, award, arbitral rules

Abstract

What is «liquidable» and how should this concept be faced by arbitrators and judges? Can an enforcement judge determine concepts such as costs, interests and/or penalties if the arbitral tribunal has not provided any parameters? What fundamental rights might be violated? In accordance with international arbitration practice, we will deal here with the problems arising from the division of functions between judges and arbitrators in relation to the enforcement of the «liquidable» concepts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-06-15

How to Cite

Rivarola Reisz, J. D., & Núñez del Prado Chaves, F. (2017). Nulla executio sine titulo: the scrutiny of awards in the practice of international arbitration as a mechanism to optimize the enforcement of awards in Peru. Derecho PUCP, (78), 69–114. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201701.004

Issue

No. 78 (2017): Procedural Law

Section

Main Section

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Derecho PUCP

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.