Supervision in Alternative Punishment: Origin, Fertilization and Resistances

Authors

  • Consuelo Murillo Universidad Andrés Bello (Chile) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8797-569X

    Profesora adjunta de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad Andrés Bello (Chile). Dirección postal: Bellavista 0121, Santiago, Chile. Abogada por la Excelentísima Corte Suprema de Chile y licenciada en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso (Chile). Magíster en Criminología y Ejecución Penal por la  Universidad Pompeu Fabra, la Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona y la Universidad de Girona (España). Doctora en Derecho por la Universidad Pompeu Fabra. 

    Código ORCID: 0000-0002-8797-569X. Correo electrónico: consuelodaniela@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202102.002

Keywords:

Alternative measures, Community sanctions, Probation, Rehabilitation, Mandatory treatment

Abstract

Nowadays we can find in common law and civil law legal systems noncustodial criminal sanctions with an intervention in the life of the offender that takes the form of supervision. In this paper, it is argued that these elements of intervention were present into alternative penalties from its inception in the common law system, which later fertilized civil law jurisdictions, that had alternative penalties without supervision. To do so, the origin and evolution of alternative penalties in both groups of jurisdictions are studied. The introduction of supervision in the civil law system in the 1960s and a second moment of fertilization or transfer in the 1990s are also taken into account, considering the broader legal and cultural processes to explain these developments and the main resistance to these changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2021-11-25

How to Cite

Murillo, C. (2021). Supervision in Alternative Punishment: Origin, Fertilization and Resistances. Derecho PUCP, (87), 35–63. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202102.002