Respectful Transgressions of Common Law and Civil Law Teaching in Quebec: Lessons from the Transsystemic Method of Legal Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202302.008Keywords:
Legal Education, Comparative Law, Bi-juridical Systems, Transsystemic MethodAbstract
This article explores how the law is taught in the bi-juridical order of Quebec, where civil law and common law coexist. It focuses mainly on how the trans-systemic method of legal education was implemented and developed at the Faculty of Law of McGill University, in Canada. This method consists of teaching both legal traditions simultaneously and comparatively. It aims to enable its graduates to navigate Canada’s political and cultural tensions, engage in cross-cultural legal dialogues and practice in two legal systems. This approach emphasizes the coexistence of two legal systems, moving away from legalistic views and embracing legal pluralism. The article explains the different contextual layers surrounding the emergence and development of this trans-systemic method. It explains the macro-institutional context by presenting the tensions between Anglo-Canada and the province of Quebec; the meso-institutional context, which focuses on the discussions within the province and the law faculty; while the micro-institutional context presents how courses on obligations/contracts and tort/torts are taught.
Downloads
References
Arthurs, H. (2005). Madly Off in One Direction: McGill’s New Integrated, Polyjural, Transsistemic Law Programme. McGill Law Journal, 50, 708-720. https://www.mcgill.ca/centre-crepeau/files/centre-crepeau/Arthurs_madly.pdf
Brierley, J. E. C. (1986). Quebec Legal Education Since 1945: Cultural Paradoxes and Traditional Ambiguities. The Dalhousie Law Journal, 10(1), 5-44. https://digitalcommons.schulichlaw.dal.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1458&context=dlj
Brierley, J. E. C., & Macdonald, R. A. (coords.). (1993). Quebec Civil Law: An Introduction to Quebec Private Law. Toronto: Emond Montgomery.
Decroix, A., Gilles, D., & Morin M. (2012). Les tribunaux et l’arbitrage en Nouvelle-France et au Québec de 1740 à 1784. Montreal: Éditions Thémis.
Dedek, H., & De Mestral, A. (2009). Born to be Wild: The ‘Trans-Systemic’ Programme at McGill and the de-nationalization of Legal Education. German Law Journal, 10(7), 889-911. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1488265
Durham, J. (1839). Report on the Affairs of British North America. Montreal.
Escobar Rosas, F. (2006). El common law y el Derecho germánico: Aportes e influencias. Entrevista al Doctor Freddy Escobar Rozas. Foro Jurídico, (6), 231-236. https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/120019
Gelli, M. (1999). Enseñanza del derecho constitucional y sistema democrático (desde la perspectiva del método socrático). Pensamiento Constitucional, 6(6), 445-466. https://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/97934
Glenn, P. (2005). Doin´ the Transsystemic: Legal Systems and Legal Traditions. McGill Law Journal, 50, 863-898. https://www.mcgill.ca/centre-crepeau/files/centre-crepeau/Glenn_doin.pdf
Glenn, P. (2010). Legal Traditions of the World (4.a ed.). Nueva York: Oxford University Press
Howes, D. (1987). From Polyjurality to Monojurality: The Transformation of Quebec Law 1875-1929. McGill Law Journal, 32(3), 523-558.
Jukier, R. (2011). Inside the Judicial Mind: Exploring Judicial Methodology in the Mixed Legal System of Quebec. Journal of Comparative Law, 6(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2002354
Jukier, R. (2005). Where Law and Pedagogy Meet in the Transsystemic Contracts Classroom. McGill Law Journal, 50, 790-808.
Jutras, D. (2001). Two Arguments for Cross-Cultural Legal Education. En H. Assmann y G. Brüggem (eds.), Unterschiedliche Rechskulturen-Konvergenz des Rechtsdenkens/Different Legal Cultures Convergence of Legal Reasoning (pp. 75-86). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2815675
Kasirer, N. (2002). Bijuralismo in Law´s Empire and in Law's Cosmos, Journal of Legal Education, 52(29), 29-41.
Kasirer, N. (2003). Legal Education as Métissage. Tulane Law Review, 78(1&2), 481-501.
Kennedy, W. (1930). Statutes, Treaties and Documents of the Canadian Constitution 1713-1929 (2.a ed.). Toronto: Oxford University Press.
León Hilario, L. L. (2007). Common law vs. Civil law: La competencia entre ordenamientos jurídicos. Réplica crítica (y amistosa) al profesor Escobar Rozas. Foro Jurídico, (7), 259-267.
L´Heureux-Dubé, C. (2002). Bijuralism: A Supreme Court of Canada Justice´s Perspective. Louisiana Law Review, 62(2), 449-466.
Macdonald R., & MacLean, J. (2005). No Toilets in Park. McGill Law Journal, 50, 721-787.
Macdonald, R. A. (1990). The National Law Programme at McGill: Origins, Establishment, prospect. Dalhousie Law Review, 13(1), 244-363.
Morel, A. (1960). La Reaction des Canadiens Devant l’Administration de la Justice de 1764 à 1774: Une Forme de Résistance Passive. La Revue du Barreau de la Province de Quebéc, 2(20), 53-63.
Morrissette, Y. (2002). McGill's Integrated Civil and Common Law Program, Journal of Legal Education, 52(1), 12-28.
Palmer, V. (coord.). (2012). Mixed Jurisdiction Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, (2.a ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139028424
Pérez Lledó, J. (1992). La enseñanza del derecho en Estados Unidos. Doxa. Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho, (12), 41-93. https://doi.org/10.14198/doxa1992.12.02
Pérez Perdomo, R. (2018). De Harvard a Stanford. Sobre la Historia de la Educación Jurídica en los Estados Unidos. Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado, LI(151), 313-358. https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484873e.2018.151.12296
Rheinstein, M. (1938). Law Faculty and Law Schools. A Comparison of Legal Education in the United States and Germany. Wisconsin Law Review, 5(4), 5-42.
Statistics Canadá. (s.f.). Table 1
Number of people and proportion of the population reporting French by selected language characteristic, Canada, 2006 and 2011 [tabla de datos]. http://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2011/as-sa/98-314-x/2011003/tbl/tbl3_1-1-eng.cfm
Strauss, P. (2006). Transsystemia–Are We Approaching a New Langdellian Moment?–Is McGill Leading the Way? Penn State International Law Review, 24(4), 763-771.
Valcke, C. (1995), Legal Education in a Mixed Jurisdiction: The Quebec Experience, Tulane European & Civil Law Forum, (10), 61-140.
Van Praagh, S. (2012). Palsgraf as ‘Transsystemic’ Tort Law. The Journal of Comparative Law, 6(2), 243-261.
Webber, J. (1994). Reimagining Canada: Language, Culture, Community, and the Canadian Constitution. Kingston y Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773564473
Weiler, P. (1982). Past and Future in Canadian Legal Education: Personal Reflections. En N. Gold (ed.), Essays on Legal Education: Centre for Studies in Canadian Legal Education (pp. 1-8). Toronto: Butterworths.
Young, B. (1994). Politics of Codification: The Lower Canadian Civil Code of 1866. Montreal: McGill-Queen`s University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780773565043
Canadian Pacific Railway v. Robinson (Corte Suprema [Canadá], 20 de junio de 1887). Capitulación de Montreal (8 de septiembre de 1760).
Carta Canadiense de Derechos y Libertades (17 de abril de 1982).
Código Civil del Bajo Canadá (1 de agosto de 1866).
Código Civil de Quebec (1 de enero de 1994).
Co-operatice Insurance Society Ltd. v. Argyll Stores (Holdings) Ltd. (Cámara de los Lores [Reino Unido], 21 de mayo de 1997).
Construction Belcourt Ltée v. Golden Griddle Pancake House Ltd. (Corte Superior de Quebec [Canadá], 1988).
Desrosiers v. Canada (Corte Suprema [Canadá], 2 de febrero de 1920).
Estatuto de Westminster (11 de diciembre de 1931). Ley Constitucional de 1791 (26 de diciembre de 1791).
Ley de la Corte Suprema (8 de abril de 1875). Ley de la Corte Suprema de Canadá (1985).
Ley de la Norteamérica Británica de 1774 (22 de junio de 1774).
Ley de la Norteamérica Británica de 1867 (29 de marzo de 1867).
La Ley de la Unión de 1840: Una Ley para Unir a las Provincias del Alto Canadá y del Bajo Canadá y para el Gobierno de Canadá (10 de febrero de 1841).
La Proclamación Real (7 de octubre de 1763).
Reference re Supreme Court Act ss 5 and 6 (Corte Suprema [Canadá], 21 de marzo de 2014).
Tratado de París (10 de febrero de 1763).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Álvaro Córdova Flores
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
