The Anticipated Proof in Arbitration

Authors

  • Marianella Ledesma Narváez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.200501.014

Keywords:

Advance Evidence, Arbitration, Jurisdiction, Arbitration Agreement, Procedural Facilitators, Procedural Stability

Abstract

The General Arbitration Law provides for the possibility of applying for pre-arbitration interim measures; however, it does not detail specific provisions regarding the securing of evidence by the jurisdiction prior to the commencement of arbitral proceedings. In this context, it is common that, prior to arbitral proceedings, situations arise in which it is necessary to resort to the jurisdiction to collect and protect evidence. In order to ensure the stability of the future process, it is possible to use procedural facilitators to ensure that the required evidence is available and protected when the arbitration is initiated. This is despite the existence of an arbitration agreement, as the use of evidence in advance in court is fully permissible. This situation does not affect the validity of the arbitration agreement and does not prevent the parties from later resorting to arbitration to resolve the dispute. Consequently, the objective of this measure is to guarantee access to judicial protection in exceptional circumstances and to preserve sources of evidence before arbitration is initiated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Condorelli, E. (1986). Del abuso y la mala fe dentro del proceso. Buenos Aires: Abeledo-Perrot.

Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República del Perú. Sala Civil Permanente. (1999). Casación 1261-1999.

Diálogos con la Jurisprudencia. (2004). Tendencias Jurisprudenciales. Diálogos con la Jurisprudencia, año 9, (67), abril 2004. Gaceta Jurídica.

Diez-Picazo Jiménez, I. (2000). Derecho Procesal Civil: Conforme a la Ley 1/2000, de 7 de enero, de Enjuiciamiento Civil (2ª ed.). Madrid: Centro de Estudios Ramón Areces.

García Vila, M. (2003). Diligencias preliminares y la negativa a su práctica (art. 261 LEC 1/2000). Revista Peruana de Derecho Procesal, (6), 149-172.

Gómez Colemer, J. (1995). Derecho Jurisdiccional, Vol II. Barcelona: Bosh.

Gómez de Liaño Gonzales, F., y Pérez-Cruz Martín, A. (2001). Derecho Procesal Civil, Tomo II. Oviedo: Forum.

Guasp, J. (1968). Derecho Procesal Civil. (3ª ed. corr.). Madrid: Instituto de Estudios Políticos.

Ledesma Narváez, M. (2003). Jurisprudencia actual: con aplicación práctica del Código civil, del Código procesal civil y de la legislación comercial. Gaceta Jurídica Editores.

Palacio, L. (1990). Derecho Procesal Civil. Buenos Aires: Abeledo Perrot.

Published

2005-12-01

How to Cite

Ledesma Narváez, M. (2005). The Anticipated Proof in Arbitration. Derecho PUCP, (58), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.200501.014