Debate on Popular Action

Authors

  • Manuel Álvarez Simonetti Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.197401.006

Keywords:

Hierarchy of norms, Constitutional guaranties, Normative validity, Constitutional Procedural Law, Principle of legality, Legitimate interest, Retroactive effects

Abstract

The class action was established in the 19th century, highlighting its relevance over time. In Peru, its incorporation materialized with the Constitution of 1933. However, since its implementation, several problems have arisen in its understanding. The objective of this paper is to clarify the deficiencies present in Article 133 of the Political Constitution of Peru and to propose an exegesis congruent with the normative text. To this end, the context, content and application of the norm in question will be analyzed in order to arrive at the most adequate reading of the aforementioned article.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

1974-12-01

How to Cite

Álvarez Simonetti, M. (1974). Debate on Popular Action. Derecho PUCP, (32), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.197401.006

Issue

No. 32 (1974)

Section

Estudios

License

Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.