Intertwined Actions against serious environmental damage: The impact of Shell in Nigeria
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201301.011Keywords:
transnational corporations, liability, environmental damages, environmental justiceAbstract
The demand for natural resources and energy continues to growin the developed world and, with it, the negative impacts on the environment and the rights of the peoples directly affected by extractive activities undertaken by the largest transnational corporations. Three factors compel victims of serious environmental damage to resort simultaneously to any available avenue of legal action (whether judicial or non-judicial, national or international): (1) the link between environmental damage and human rights abuses; (2) weak legislation, combined with the inability or unwillingness of the law-enforcing institutions in many countries where such extractive activities take place; and (3) the absence of international avenues to claim direct liability from corporations. We call this phenomenon intertwined actions, as the various judicial actions undertaken by the victims end up mutually reinforcing and increasing the visibility of the problem. The aim of this paper is to show this reality on the basis of the various instances of litigation that are taking place in the specific context of Shell’s activities in the Niger delta.Downloads
References
African [Banjul] Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, June 27, 1981, OAU Doc. CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5; 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982).
Amnistía internacional: La verdadera «tragedia». Demoras e inacción frente a los vertidos de petróleo del delta del Níger. Índice AI: AFR 44/018/2011, (http://www.amnistiainternacional.org/publicacion-188), 2011.
Badia, Anna & otros (coords.). El derecho internacional ante los retos de nuestro tiempo. Homenaje a la Profesora Victoria Abellán Honrubia. Madrid/Barcelona/Buenos Aires: Marcial Pons, 2009, pp. 517-569.
Bodo Community v Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Case No. HQ11X01280.
Brief for the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America As Amicus Curiae in Support of Defendant-Appellee Talisman Energy, Inc., and in Support of Affirmance, May 8, 2007, en el litigio Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, Inc.
Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae Supporting Petitioner, Supreme Court, Esther Kiobel, individually and on behalf of her late husband Dr. Barinem Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al, 21 December 2011, [7]-[8], (www.earthrights.org/sites/default/files/documents/USG-Kiobel-amicus.pdf)).
Carmichael v. United Technologies Corp., 835 F.2d 109 (5th Cir. 1988).
Código Procesal Civil neerlandés.
Corte de Apelaciones del Noveno Circuito —Sarei v. Rio Tinto, PLC, No. 02-56256, 2011 WL 5041927 (9th Cir. Oct. 25, 2011).
Corte de Apelaciones del Distrito de Columbia —Doe v. Exxon Mobil Corp., 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 13934 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 2011).
Corte de Apelaciones del Séptimo Circuito —en Flomo v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co., LLC, 643 F.3d 1013 (7th Cir. Ind. 2011).
Corte del Distrito Este de Nueva York In Re «Agent Orange» Product Liability Litigation, 373 F. Supp. 2d 7, 56-57 (E.D.N.Y. 2005).
Corte Suprema .Caso Álvarez-Machain, el 29 de junio de 2004. Ver Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004), 124 S.Ct. 2739 (2004).
Frynas, Jedrzej George (2004). «Social and environmental litigation against transnational firms in Africa», Journal of Modern African Studies, 42, 3, pp. 363–388.
Human Rights Watch. «The Price of Oil: Corporate Responsibility and Human Rights Violations in Nigeria’s Oil Producing Communities», HRW Index No. 1-56432-225-4, 1999, (http://www.hrw.org/reports/1999/nigeria/).
Informe de la US Energy Information Administration (EIA) sobre Nigeria, (http://www.eia.gov/countries/analysisbriefs/Nigeria/nigeria.pdf), 2012.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, 621 F.3d 111, 149 (2d Cir. 2011), September 17, 2010.
Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Company, 642 F.3d 268 (2d Cir. 2011) y 642 F.3d 379 (2d Cir. 2011), February 4, 2011
Oil Pipelines Act, Chapter 338, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, (http://www.nigeria-law.org/Oil%20Pipelines%20Act.htm), 1990.
Organization of African Unity. African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights («Banjul Charter»), 27 de junio de 1981, CAB/LEG/67/3 rev. 5, 21 I.L.M. 58 (1982). (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/3ae6b3630.html).
Petroleum Act. Cap. 350 L.F.N. 1990 Act Cap. 10 L.F.N. 20041, (http://www.babalakinandco.com/resources/lawsnigeria/LAWS/90350petroleum%20act.htm).
Pigrau, Antoni (2010). «La responsabilidad civil de las empresas transnacionales a través de la Alien Tort Claims Act por su participación en violaciones de derechos humanos». Revista Española de Desarrollo y Cooperación, 25 , pp. 113-130.
Pigrau, Antoni & otros. Legal avenues for Ejos to claim environmental liability. EJOLT Report 4, (http://www.ejolt.org/section/resources/reports/), 2012.
Protocol A/P.I/7/91 on the Community Court of Justice (http://www.courtecowas.org/site2012/pdf_files/protocol.pdf).
Protocolo adoptado en Accra el 19 de enero de 2005, que añade un nuevo Artículo 10: Supplementary Protocol A/SP.1/01/05 Amending the Preamble and Articles 1, 2, 9 and 30 of
Protocol A/P.I/7/91 relating to the Community Court of Justice and Article 4 Paragraph 1 of the said Protocol, (http://www.courtecowas.org/site2012/pdf_files/supplementary_protocol.pdf).
Revised Treaty of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), 24 July 1993, (http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/492182d92.html).
Royal Dutch Shell in the Níger Delta. Complaint to the UK and Dutch National Contact Points under the Specific Instance Procedure of the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises, 25 January 2011, Submitted by: Amnesty International, Friends of the Earth International, Friends of the Earth Netherlands (http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/pdfs/2011/oecd-submission), pp. 12-13.
Sentencia del Tribunal de Distrito de La Haya (Sección Mercantil) de 30 de enero de 2013, asunto F.A. Akpan y Vereniging Milieudefensie c. Royal Dutch Shell PLC y Shell Petroleum Development Company of Nigeria Ltd. (C/09/337050 / HA ZA 09-1580), § 4.6
SERAP v. Nigeria, Ruling, Suit No: ECW/CCJ/APP/08/09 and RUL. No: ECW/CCJ/APP/07/10 (ECOWAS, Dec. 10, 2010), (http://www.worldcourts.com/ecowasccj/eng/decisions/2010.12.10_SERAP_v_Nigeria.htm).
Steiner, Richard. Double Standard (2010). Shell Practices in Nigeria Compared With International Standards to Prevent and Control Pipeline Oil Spills and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, (http://www.foei.org/en/resources/publications/pdfs/2010/double-standard-shell-practices-in-nigeria-compared-with-international-standards/view).
Stephens, Beth. «Corporate Accountability: International Human Rights Litigation Against Corporations in US Courts». En Kamminga, Menno & Salman zia-zariFi (eds.). Liability of Multinational Corporations Under International Law. La Haya: Kluwer, 2000, pp. 209-229.
Supplemental Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Partial Support of Affirmance, US Supreme Court, Esther Kiobel, individually and on behalf of her late husband Dr. Barinem Kiobel, et al., v Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al, 13 June 2012, (http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/Kiobel-US-supp-brief-6-13-12.pdf).
The Court of Justice of the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS): SERAP, Applicant v. Federal Republic of Nigeria, Defendant, General List N°ECW/CCJ/APP/08/09. Judgment N° ECW/CCJ/JUD/18/12, 14 December 2012, (http://www.courtecowas.org/site2012/pdf_files/decisions/judgements/2012/SERAP_V_FEDERAL_REPUBLIC_OF_NIGERIA.pdf).
The Social and Economic Rights Action Center and the Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria, African Commission on Human and Peoples’ Rights, Comm. No. 155/96 (2001). Ver al respecto, shelton, Dinah. «International Decisions: Decision Regarding Communication 155/96 (Social and Economic Rights Action Center / Center for Economic and Social Rights v. Nigeria). Case No. ACHPR/COMM/A044/1». En American Journal of International Law, 96 (2002), pp. 937-942
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Environmental Assessment of Ogoniland Report.Nairobi: 2011, (http://www.unep.org/nigeria/). El Informe fue encargado por el Gobierno de Nigeria y recibió financiación de Shell, por lo que se basa en datos de la propia empresa y no entra en el ámbito de las responsabilidades.
Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 226 F.3d 88, 95 (2d Cir. 2000).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
