¿Does alleged consent exist?: the alleged will as underlying justification

Authors

  • Romy Alexandra Chang Kcomt Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogada por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Magister en Derecho Penal por la Universidad de Salamanca. Profesora Ordinaria Asociada de la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú en la que dicta Derecho Penal. Socia fundadora del Estudio Padilla & Chang Abogados.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.014

Keywords:

Alleged Consent, Alleged Will, Underlying Justification, Non-criminal Behavior, Subrogation, Requirements, Performances in Foreing Interest, Actios on Self-interest

Abstract

In this paper, the author analyzes the alleged consent, stating their stance against it and proposing, instead, the alleged will, considering that the last is right for describe the legal fiction used to recreate the moment in which the legal holder knows the fact and have the possibility of providing consent to excute the ‘ilicit’ action. In this line, the author reviewed the theories that explain the legal nature of the alleged will, rejecting it as a noncriminal behavior and considering it an autonomous underlying justification. Also, the author describes the requirements of this alleged will, differentiating it from other situations as subrogation. Finally, the author makes a review of the two categories where the alleged will occurs: performances in foreign interest and actions on self-interest.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-09-13

How to Cite

Chang Kcomt, R. A. (2017). ¿Does alleged consent exist?: the alleged will as underlying justification. IUS ET VERITAS, (54), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201702.014

Issue

Section

Main Section