Self-regulation and sexist advertising: Opportunity for improvement for CONAR

Authors

  • Alex Sosa Universidad del Pacífico

    Jefe del Área de Competencia y Relaciones de Consumo de AMÉRICA MOVIL PERÚ (CLARO). Magíster en Derecho de la Propiedad Intelectual y de la Competencia por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Abogado Summa Cum Laude por la Universidad de Lima. Profesor de cursos de competencia desleal en la PUCP, Universidad del Pacífico y USMP. El autor fue Secretario Técnico del CONAR durante el periodo 2009 – 2015.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201801.005

Keywords:

Sexist Advertising, Self-regulation, Advertising Code of Ethics, CONAR, Principle of Social Adequacy

Abstract

In this article, the author develops the problem ofs exist advertising and he sets out self-regulation as an alternative to sanction it. Along these lines, he introduces CONAR as an institution responsible for self-regulation within advertising, and he highlights the issuance of an objective criterion for evaluation and eventual sanction of sexist advertising, this within the framework of the validity of its Advertising Code of Ethics 2007, but after a series of modifications to regulatory framework, the author criticizes its lack of application, and he culminates affirming the advantages of an advertising self-regulation, represented through CONAR.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-10-01

How to Cite

Sosa, A. (2018). Self-regulation and sexist advertising: Opportunity for improvement for CONAR. IUS ET VERITAS, (56), 74–85. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201801.005

Issue

Section

Main Section