Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks

Authors

  • Juan Manuel Indacochea Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina

    Ex Consultor interno de la Magistratura del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia en el Tribunal de Justicia de la Comunidad Andina (TJCA). Colaborador de la Magistratura de la República del Perú en el TJCA. Abogado por la PUCP. Máster en Derecho Internacional por la Universidad de Nanterre (Paris X). Máster en Derecho de la Propiedad Intelectual y Comercio por la Universidad de Estrasburgo (CEIPI).

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201801.007

Keywords:

Functionality, National Judge, Tactile Mark, Principle of Autonomy, Community Law, Andean Court of Justice

Abstract

On August 24, 2015, the Andean Court of Justice issued the Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015, on the tactile mark consisting in the surface of the whisky bottle Old Parr. This Preliminary Ruling is the first one rendered by an international court about tactile marks. The purpose of this paper is to explain the application of the main registration requirements to new types of marks, in the light of the criteria explained in the aforementioned Preliminary Ruling. It also aims to analyze the previous jurisprudential development, concerning the active legitimacy of the Administrative Authorities of the Member Countries to optionally request Preliminary Rulings. That is the first question –or subject– addressed in the above-mentioned Preliminary Ruling since the interpretation was requested by an Administrative Authority of Colombia.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2018-10-01

How to Cite

Indacochea, J. M. (2018). Preliminary Ruling 242-IP-2015 of the Andean Court of Justice. About the active legitimacy of administrative authorities to request preliminary ruling and the registration requirements applied to tactile marks. IUS ET VERITAS, (56), 106–129. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201801.007

Issue

Section

Main Section