The Ambiguous nature of the Concept of Genocide: Between Sociology and Law. An analysis based on discussion around political genocide

Authors

  • Farid Samir Benavides Vanegas Universitat Ramón Llull

    PhD Profesor Asociado Miembro del Grupo GLOBALCODES Facultad de Comunicación y Relaciones Internacionales Universitat Ramón Llull – Blanquerna, Barcelona.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201802.008

Keywords:

Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, Sociology, Holocaust, Genocide, Social Groups, Ethnic Cleansing

Abstract

In this paper, the author focuses on treatment that genocide receives from the field of sociology, then he checks the differences of sociological studies with legal regulation contained in Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide, specifically to groups that are subject to protection in legal definition of genocide.
To achieve his purpose, the author develops how the process of production of the Convention was as well the criticism of legal definition of genocide in sociology. The author concludes sociological definitions have limitations, gives primacy to legal concept of genocide and affirms that social groups not protected by the Convention find protection by other rules of International Criminal Law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-04-15

How to Cite

Benavides Vanegas, F. S. (2019). The Ambiguous nature of the Concept of Genocide: Between Sociology and Law. An analysis based on discussion around political genocide. IUS ET VERITAS, (57), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.201802.008

Issue

Section

Main Section