Controversies about the extension of time within the framework of public Works

Authors

  • Leandro García Valdez Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9466-4673

    Abogado por la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (Lima, Perú). Postgrado en Derecho Administrativo y Arbitraje por el Centro de Análisis y Resolución de Conflictos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Especialista en Derecho de la Construcción, así como en Contratación con el Estado por ESAN, Graduate School of Business. Miembro de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Derecho de la Construcción, Young International Arbitration Group e International. Árbitro. 
    Correo electrónico: leandro.garciaval@gmail.com.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.002

Keywords:

State Procurement, Arbitration, Public Works, Extension of time

Abstract

In this paper, the author presents a logbook on the current state of controversies related to requests for extension of time in the framework of public works. Firstly, the general aspects of this legal remedy are explained. Secondly, the main controversies arising in arbitral proceedings are commented on, based on the contrast between the position that some public entities usually take to deny an extension of time, as opposed to what is regulated in the law, what is developed by doctrine and what is resolved in arbitral awards. The aim is to verify the basis of what is stated by public entities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-16

How to Cite

García Valdez, L. (2023). Controversies about the extension of time within the framework of public Works. IUS ET VERITAS, (66), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.18800/iusetveritas.202301.002

Issue

No. 66 (2023): Derecho de la Construcción

Section

Main Section

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.