Moral foundations, political identity and culture outside the us: A metanalytical study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/psico.202602.008Keywords:
Moral foundations, Political ideology, Ideology, Group conflict, Meta-analysisAbstract
Moral Foundations Theory has received great attention since its inception, especially regarding its hypothesis about the moral differences between liberals and conservatives (Graham et al., 2011). A systematic review and meta-analysis about this topic were published recently by Kivikangas et al. (2021). However, since it mainly involved samples from the USA, it did not cover the moderating effect that cultural differences can have on the relationship between political identity and moral foundations. To replicate and complement Kivikangas et al (2021) results, a meta-analysis review of every published or unpublished research available, about the relationship between political identity and moral foundations outside the USA, was conducted. After a wide web search, a total of 46 studies from 89 countries and other two political entities (Honk Kong and Taiwan) (k = 175; N = 96,851), were selected. Pooled correlations supported Moral Foundations Theory assumptions, and effect sizes were quite similar to those presented in Kivikangas et al., (2021). Individualistic and post-materialistic culture values exhibit greater moral polarization between the two anchor labels of political identity (liberal-conservative and left-right). In contrast, cultures with more traditionalist and group-oriented values show weaker associations between moral foundations and political identity. The proportion of females and political identity also emerged as significant moderators. The possible non-linear relationship between political identity and moral foundations, and the need to consider measurement bias when utilizing the Yourmorals platform and when choosing a scale to measure moral foundations scores, are discussed.
Downloads
References
*References marked with an asterisk indicate studies included in the meta-analysis.
Aloe, A. M., Becker, B. J., & Pigott, T. D. (2010). An alternative to R2 for assessing linear models of effect size. Research Synthesis Methods, 1(3‐4), 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.23
*Atari, M., Graham, J., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Foundations of morality in Iran. Evolution and Human Behavior, 41(5), 367-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.07.014
Atari, M., Haidt, J., Graham, J., Koleva, S., Stevens, S. T., & Dehghani, M. (2023). Morality beyond the WEIRD: How the nomological network of morality varies across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 125(5), 1157–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000470
Atari, M., Lai, M. H., & Dehghani, M. (2020). Sex differences in moral judgements across 67 countries. Proceedings of the Royal Society, 287(1937), Article 20201201. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1201
*Bai, X., Gauri, V., & Fiske, S. T. (2021). Cosmopolitan morality trades off in-group for the world, separating benefits and protection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(40), Article e2100991118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100991118
*Baldner, C., Pierro, A., Chernikova, M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). When and Why Do Liberals and Conservatives Think Alike?. Social Psychology. 49(6), 360-368. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000354
Barša, P., Hesová, Z., & Slačálek, O. (Eds.). (2021). Central European culture wars: beyond post communism and populism. Humanitas. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11956/170756
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994). Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics, 50(4), 1088-1101. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533446
Borenstein, M.J., Hedges, L.V., Higgins, J.P.T., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Wiley. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470743386
Botella, J., & Sánchez-Meca, J. (2015). Meta-análisis en ciencias sociales y de la salud [Meta-analysis in social and health sciences]. Editorial Síntesis.
Çakın, B., Glas, S., & Spierings, N. (2024). Polarization, religiosity, and support for gender equality: A comparative study across four Muslim-majority countries. Women's Studies International Forum, 103(4), Article 102880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2024.102880
Cheong, Y., & Haggard, S. (2023). Political polarization in Korea. Democratization, 30(7), 1215-1239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2023.2217762
Clark, C., & Tan, A. C. (2012). Political polarization in Taiwan: a growing challenge to catch-all parties?. Journal of Current Chinese Affairs, 41(3), 7-31.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1868102612041003
Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Cabeza, R., & Sinnott-Armstrong, W. (2015). Moral foundations vignettes: A standardized stimulus database of scenarios based on moral foundations theory. Behavior research methods, 47(4), 1178-1198. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0551-2
Conversi, D. (2020). The left and nationalism: From the French Revolution to the Anthropocene. In L. Greenfeld & Z. Wu (Eds.) Research handbook on nationalism (pp. 34-52). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903447.00009
*Côté-Lussier, C., & Carmichael, J. T. (2018). Public support for harsh criminal justice policy and its moral and ideological tides. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 24(2), 235-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/law0000148
Davis, D. E., Dooley, M. T., Hook, J. N., Choe, E., & McElroy, S. E. (2017). The purity/sanctity subscale of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire does not work similarly for religious versus non-religious individuals. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 9(1), 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/rel0000057
Davis, D. E., Rice, K., Van Tongeren, D. R., Hook, J. N., DeBlaere, C., Worthington, E. L., Jr., & Choe, E. (2016). The moral foundations hypothesis does not replicate well in Black samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(4), e23–e30. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000056
*Di Battista, S., Pivetti, M., & Berti, C. (2018). Moral foundations, political orientation and religiosity in Italy. The Open Psychology Journal, 11(1), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874350101811010046
Dolatabadi, H. (2017). Right/left dualism in politics: a French invention. Evropský politický a právní diskurz, (5), 76-83. https://eppd13.cz/wp-content/uploads/2017/2017-4-5/13.pdf
Feldman, S., & Johnston, C. (2014). Understanding the determinants of political ideology: Implications of structural complexity. Political Psychology, 35(3), 337-358. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12055
*Findor, A. (2015). Moral Foundations of Welfare Attitudes: The Role of Moral Intuition and Reasoning in Pursuing Social Justice. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 9(2), 72-83. https://doi.org/10.1515/cejpp-2016-0013
Fossati, D. (2024). Reassessing Political Polarization and Democratic Development in Southeast Asia Research Center. https://www.cityu.edu.hk/searc/Resources/Paper/24071912_Working%20Paper_202407_Polarization%20in%20Southeast%20Asia.pdf
Frimer, J. A., Biesanz, J. C., Walker, L. J., & MacKinlay, C. W. (2013). Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1040-1059. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032277
*Giacomantonio, M., Pierro, A., Baldner, C., & Kruglanski, A. (2017). Need for Closure, Torture, and Punishment Motivations. Social Psychology. 48, 335-347. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000321.
Graham, J., & Haidt, J. (2012). Sacred values and evil adversaries: A moral foundations approach. In M. Mikulincer & P. R. Shaver (Eds.), The social psychology of morality: Exploring the causes of good and evil (pp. 11–31). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13091-001
Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in experimental social psychology 47, 55-130. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00002-4
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of personality and social psychology, 96(5), 1029-1046. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015141
*Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of personality and social psychology, 101(2), 366-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021847
Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
Haidt, J., & Joseph, C. (2008). The moral mind: How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues, and perhaps even modules. In P. Carruthers, S. Laurence, & S. Stich (Eds.), Evolution and cognition. The innate mind Vol. 3. Foundations and the future (pp. 367-391). Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195332834.003.0019
Haerpfer, C., Inglehart, R., Moreno, A., Welzel, C., Kizilova, K., Diez-Medrano J., M. Lagos, P. Norris, E. Ponarin & B. Puranen (Eds.). (2024) World Values Survey: Round Seven – Country-Pooled Datafile Version 6.0.0. [Dataset]. JD Systems Institute & WVSA Secretariat. https://doi.org/10.14281/18241.24
*Harper, C. A., & Hogue, T. E. (2018). The role of intuitive moral foundations in Britain's vote on EU membership. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 29(2), 90-103 https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2386
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and brain sciences, 33(2-3), 61-83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
Hesová, Z. (2021). Three types of culture wars and the populist strategies in Central Europe. Politologický časopis-Czech Journal of Political Science, 28(2), 130-150. https://doi.org/10.5817/PC2021-2-130
Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's consequences: International differences in work-related values. Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), Article 8.
https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
*Hren, D., Buljan, I., & Marušić, A. (2020). Moral Foundations theory in the context of a political scandal: Two cross sectional studies in Croatia. ST-OPEN, 1, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.48188/so.1.3
Huang, C., & Kuo, T. C. (2022). Actual and perceived polarization on independence-unification views in Taiwan. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.2022174
Huddy, L., Sears, D. O., & Levy, J. S. (Eds.). (2013). The Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press.
Huedo-Medina, T. B., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & Botella, J. (2006). Assessing heterogeneity in meta-analysis: Q statistic or I² index?. Psychological methods, 11(2), 193-220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.193
Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define America. Basic Books.
Inglehart, R. (1997). Modernization and postmodernization: Cultural, economic, and political change in 43 societies. Princeton university press.
Inglehart, R. F. (2013). Changing values among western publics from 1970 to 2006. In K. H. Goetz, P. Mair & G. Smith (Eds.). European Politics: Pasts, presents, futures (pp. 130-146). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315876207
*Jarmakowski, T., & Jarmakowska-Kostrzanowska, L. (2016). Polska adaptacja Kwestionariusza kodów moralnych (MFQ-PL) [The Polish adaptation of the Moral Foundation Questionnaire (MFQ-PL)]. Psychologia Społeczna XI (39), 489-508. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4800.3840
*Jöckel, S., & Früh, H. (2016). ‘The world ain’t all sunshine’: Investigating the relationship between mean world beliefs, conservatism and crime TV. Communications, 41(2), 195-217. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2016-0001
Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., & Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual review of psychology, 60, 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600
*Kim, K. R., & Kang, J. S. (2013). Liberal–conservative self-identification in Korea: a cross-cultural explanation. Korean Social Science Journal, 40(2), 113-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40483-013-0009-7
*Kim, K. R., Kang, J. S., & Yun, S. (2012). Moral intuitions and political orientation: Similarities and differences between South Korea and the United States. Psychological reports, 111(1), 173-185. https://doi.org/10.2466/17.09.21.PR0.111.4.173-185
Kivikangas, J. M., Fernández-Castilla, B., Järvelä, S., Ravaja, N., & Lönnqvist, J.-E. (2021). Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 147(1), 55-94. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000308
*Kivikangas, J. M., Lönnqvist, J. E., & Ravaja, N. (2017). Relationship of moral foundations to political liberalism-conservatism and left-right orientation in a Finnish representative sample. Social Psychology 48(4), 246-251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000297
*Klein, R. A., Vianello, M., Hasselman, F., Adams, B. G., Adams Jr, R. B., Alper, S., ... & Batra, R. (2018). Many Labs 2: Investigating variation in replicability across samples and settings. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(4), 443-490. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245918810225
*Laakasuo, M., Drosinou, M., Koverola, M., Kunnari, A., Halonen, J., Lehtonen, N., & Palomäki, J. (2018). What makes people approve or condemn mind upload technology? Untangling the effects of sexual disgust, purity and science fiction familiarity. Palgrave Communications, 4(1), Article 84. http://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-018-0124-6
Lee, C., Shin, J., & Hong, A. (2018). Does social media use really make people politically polarized? Direct and indirect effects of social media use on political polarization in South Korea. Telematics and Informatics, 35(1), 245-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.11.005
*Lewis, G. J., & Bates, T. C. (2011). From left to right: How the personality system allows basic traits to influence politics via characteristic moral adaptations. British Journal of Psychology, 102(3), 546-558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.2011.02016.x
Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. R. (2021). Empirically derived guidelines for effect size interpretation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2752
*Macko, A. (2012). Intuicje moralne młodych polskich liberałów i konserwatystów [Intuiciones morales de jóvenes liberales y conservadores polacos]. Psychologia Społeczna, 7(22), 245–260. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=90989
*Malka, A., Osborne, D., Soto, C. J., Greaves, L. M., Sibley, C. G., & Lelkes, Y. (2016). Binding moral foundations and the narrowing of ideological conflict to the traditional morality domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(9), 1243-1257. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216653936
*Marques, L. M., Clifford, S., Iyengar, V., Bonato, G. V., Cabral, P. M., dos Santos, R. B., Cabeza, R., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Boggio, P. S. (2020). Translation and validation of the Moral Foundations Vignettes (MFVs) for the Portuguese language in a Brazilian sample. Judgment and Decision Making, 15(1), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500006963
*Métayer, S., & Pahlavan, F. (2014). Validation de l'adaptation française du questionnaire des principes moraux fondateurs. [Validation of the French adaptation of the moral foundations questionnaire]. Revue internationale de psychologie sociale, 27(2), 79-107. https://www.cairn.info/revue-internationale-de-psychologie-sociale-2014-2-page-79.htm
*Milesi, P. (2017). Moral Foundations and Voting Intention in Italy. Europe's journal of psychology, 13(4), 667-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v13i4.1391
*Milfont, T. L., Davies, C. L., & Wilson, M. S. (2019). The Moral Foundations of Environmentalism. Social Psychological Bulletin, 14(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.32872/spb.v14i2.32633
Mosteller, F., & Hoaglin, D. C. (1991). Preliminary examination of data. In D C. Hoaglin, F. Mosteller & J. W. Tukey (Eds.) Fundamentals of exploratory analysis of variance (pp. 40-49). John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470316832
*Murayama, A., & Miura, A. (2019). Validation of the Japanese Version of the Moral Foundation Questionnaire: Investigating the relationship with ideologies. The Japanese Journal of Psychology, 90(2), 156-166. https://doi.org/10.4992/jjpsy.90.17234
Nakphin, S., Po-In, S., & Kongrungchok, A. (2019). Conflict Management of Expatriates under Hofstede’s Cultural Dimension Differences. WMS Journal of Management, 8(4), 70–82. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/wms/article/ view/223145
*Nilsson, A., & Erlandsson, A. (2015). The Moral Foundations taxonomy: Structural validity and relation to political ideology in Sweden. Personality and Individual Differences, 76, 28-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.11.049
*Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2016). The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity. Journal of Research in Personality, 65, 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2016.07.001
*Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., & Västfjäll, D. (2020). Moral foundations theory and the psychology of charitable giving. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 431–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2256
*Nilsson, A., Erlandsson, A., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2021). Who are the opponents of nudging? Insights from moral foundations theory. Comprehensive results in social psychology, 5(1-3), 64-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743603.2020.1756241
*Nilsson, A., Montgomery, H., Dimdins, G., Sandgren, M., Erlandsson, A., & Taleny, A. (2020). Beyond ‘liberals’ and ‘conservatives’: Complexity in ideology, moral intuitions, and worldview among Swedish voters. European Journal of Personality, 34(3), 448-469. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2249
*Ochoa, D. P., Sio, C. P., Quiñones, D. M., & Manalastas, E. J. (2016). A bond between man and woman: Religiosity, moral foundations, and same-sex marriage attitudes in the Philippines. Philippine Journal of Psychology, 49(2), 157–171. http://www.tinyurl.com/ybgrcv3j
Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8(2), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.2307/1164923
*Piñuela, R. (2015). Manejo del terror, ideología política y mecanismos asociados al apoyo de la violencia colectiva: efectos de la amenaza existencial sobre la desconexión moral, la deshumanización y los fundamentos morales [Terror management, political ideology and mechanisms associated with supporting collective violence: effects of existential threat on moral disengagement, dehumanization and moral foundations]. [Doctoral dissertation, Universidad Complutense de Madrid] Docta Complutense. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/25670
*Quintelier, K. J., Ishii, K., Weeden, J., Kurzban, R., & Braeckman, J. (2013). Individual differences in reproductive strategy are related to views about recreational drug use in Belgium, the Netherlands, and Japan. Human Nature, 24(2), 196-217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-013-9165-0
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice: Original Edition. Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvjf9z6v
*Rossen, I. (2015). The moral roots of socio-political attitudes: how moral foundations theory can help to understand contested scientific issues and political ideology. [Doctoral dissertation, University of Western Australia] https://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/files/9318154/Rossen_Isabel_2015.pdf
*Rossen, I., Hurlstone, M. J., Dunlop, P. D., & Lawrence, C. (2019). Accepters, fence sitters, or rejecters: Moral profiles of vaccination attitudes. Social Science & Medicine, 224, 23-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.038
*Rutjens, B. T., & van der Lee, R. (2020). Spiritual skepticism? Heterogeneous science skepticism in the Netherlands. Public Understanding of Science, 29(3), 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520908534
Sánchez-Meca, J., & Marín-Martínez, F. (2008). Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. Psychological Methods, 13(1), 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.13.1.31
*Sayılan, G. (2018). Worldviews and ideological orientations: an integration of polarity theory, dual process model, and moral foundations theory [Doctoral Dissertation, Middle East Technical University] OpenMetu. https://hdl.handle.net/11511/27715
*Sayılan, G., Türkoğlu, B., & Cingöz-Ulu, B. (2020). Keeping my distance: prejudice towards transwomen and its socio-political and moral predictors. Psychology & Sexuality, 11(1-2), 135-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2019.1686055
Schwartz, S. (2006). A Theory of Cultural Value Orientations: Explication and Applications. Comparative Sociology, 5(2-3), 137-182. https://doi.org/10.1163/156913306778667357
Schwartz, S. (2008). The 7 Schwartz cultural value orientation scores for 80 countries. [Data set]. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304715744_The_7_Schwartz_cultural_value_orientation_scores_for_80_countries
*Šķupele, I. (2011). Uzskatos par labu un ļaunu cilvēku novērojamās kopīgāks realitātes saistība ar ideoloģisko orientāciju un morāles pamatu nozīmīgumu [Shared reality in beliefs about a good and evil person, political ideology and the importance of moral foundation] [Doctoral dissertation, University of Latvia] DSpace. http://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/handle/7/4686
Soeters, J. L. (1996). Culture and Conflict: An Application of Hofstede’s Theory to the Conflict in the Former Yugoslavia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2(3), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327949pac0203_4
Swedlow, B. (2008). Beyond liberal and conservative: Two-dimensional conceptions of ideology and the structure of political attitudes and values. Journal of Political Ideologies, 13(2), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/13569310802075969
Tepe, S. (2014). The perils of polarization and religious parties: The democratic challenges of political fragmentation in Israel and Turkey. In L. Ozzano & F. Cavatorta (Eds.) Religiously Oriented Parties and Democratization (pp. 33-58). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315773766
*Trups-Kalne, I. (2014). Sociālā konservatīvisma skalas latviešu valodā izveide un validitātes pārbaude [Construction and validation of social conservativism scale in Latvian]. Psiholoģija, 801, 7–34. https://dspace.lu.lv/dspace/bitstream/handle/7/28391/LU_Raksti-801_psihologija.pdf
Ubaid, A. H., & Subandi, H. H. (2023). Political Polarization based on Religious Identities: Empirical Evidence from the 2017 Jakarta Gubernatorial Election. Jurnal Studi Pemerintahan, 8(4), 411–441. https://doi.org/10.18196/jgp.2017.0054.411-441
*Vainio, A., & Mäkiniemi, J. P. (2016). How are moral foundations associated with climate-friendly consumption? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 29(2), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-016-9601-3
*Vecina, M. L. (2014). The Five Moral Foundations Sacredness Scale in men in court-mandated treatment for violently abusing their partners. Personality and individual differences, 64, 46-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.02.021
Viechtbauer, W. (2010). Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor package. Journal of statistical software, 36(3), 1-48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03
Viechtbauer, W., & Cheung, M. W. L. (2010). Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta‐analysis. Research synthesis methods, 1(2), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.11
*White, C. J. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2022). Karma and God: Convergent and divergent mental representations of supernatural norm enforcement. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 14(1), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/rel0000436
Wilson, D. B. (2005). Meta-analysis macros for SAS, SPSS, and Stata. http://mason.gmu.edu/~dwilsonb/archive/spss_macros.zip
*Yalçındağ, B., Özkan, T., Cesur, S., Yilmaz, O., Tepe, B., Piyale, Z. E., Biten, A. F., & Sunar, D. (2019). An investigation of moral foundations theory in Turkey using different measures. Current Psychology, 38, 440–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9618-4
*Yilmaz, O., Harma, M., Bahçekapili, H. G., & Cesur, S. (2016). Validation of the moral foundations questionnaire in Turkey and its relation to cultural schemas of individualism and collectivism. Personality and Individual Differences, 99, 149-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.090
