The differences between legal and economic labor arbitrarion, and its impact on diffuse constitutional control

Authors

  • Jorge Luis Acevedo Mercado Benites, Forno & Ugaz Abogados
    Abogado. Miembro de la Sociedad Peruana de Derecho del Trabajo y la Seguridad Social. Socio de Benites, Forno & Ugaz Abogados.

Keywords:

Juridical labor arbitration, economic labor arbitration, jurisdiction, diffuse control, contest of arbitral award

Abstract

Labor Law is called to solve and prevent arisingconflicts between employers and employees. In light of this, certain conflicts between the employer and a union, or his own employees, can be solved by an arbitration board.
In that line, it is important to take into account the many existing differences between juridical labor arbitration and economic labor arbitration; the author, in the present article, arguments that those differences represent the fundamental reason why the first one does exercise jurisdictional function and the second one does not. On that basis, the author affirms that it’s possible to exercise diffuse control in economic labor arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2014-11-14

How to Cite

Acevedo Mercado, J. L. (2014). The differences between legal and economic labor arbitrarion, and its impact on diffuse constitutional control. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (65), 145–159. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/10861

Issue

Section

Derecho Laboral