Demystifying myths: Economic analysis of double hearings in the Peruvian civil process

Authors

  • Fabio Núñez del Prado Chaves Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
    Bachiller en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Adjunto de docencia de loscursos de Responsabilidad Civil, Teoría de la Prueba, Personas Jurídicas y Tutela Cautelar en la PUCP. Miembro de la Asociación Internacional Arbitration Academy. Ex Interno de la Corte Internacional de Arbitraje de la Cámara de Comercio Internacional. Asociado del Estudio Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez. Contacto: fabio.np05@gmail.com

Keywords:

Peruvian civil process, principle of the right to a second hearing, Coase theorem, principle of effectiveness of judicial protection, principles of orality and immediacy

Abstract

Inside the Peruvian civil process, there are warranties that seek to protect the rights of the persons who come to it. Since these warranties  are  affirmed in the   Peruvian Constitution and in international human rights treaties, they are considered as fundamental rights. One of them is the right to a second hearing.

The present essay is a constructive critic of the principle of the right to appeal. The hypothesis consists in proving, through an economic analysis,  that  the  second hearing does not play a role in our legal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2014-05-21

How to Cite

Núñez del Prado Chaves, F. (2014). Demystifying myths: Economic analysis of double hearings in the Peruvian civil process. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (66), 393–412. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/themis/article/view/12708

Issue

No. 66 (2014): Treinta Aniversario del Código Civil

Section

Misceláneas

License

Copyright (c) 2016 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.