The recourse of annulment of the arbitral award and the right to tantrum

Authors

  • Fabio Núñez del Prado Chaves Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Abogado. Profesor en Derecho por la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Asociado internacional del área de arbitraje internacional de la Firma de Abogados Uría Menéndez. Profesor de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas y la Universidad ESAN. Miembro de la asociación internacional Arbitration Academy.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.001

Keywords:

international arbitration, control of power, right to tantrum, enforcement, Constitutional State, rule of law, award, recourse of annulment, Waiver, recognition

Abstract

Is it advisable for a State to eliminate the annulment action of its Law of Arbitration? Can the parties, by virtue of their party autonomy, waive the annulment action?.
In the present article, the author demonstrates that the annulment action has a psychological and a legal-political basis, since, on the one hand, it satisfies the psychological need to challenge or contradict, which is inherent of human beings and; on the other, within the framework of Constitutional State it constitutes a democratic tool that guarantees the control of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-04-24

How to Cite

Núñez del Prado Chaves, F. (2017). The recourse of annulment of the arbitral award and the right to tantrum. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (71), 13–30. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.001