No pain, no gain: nine proposals to improve the future of international arbitration

Authors

  • José María de la Jara Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado. Profesor de Análisis Psicológico del Derecho en la Universidad del Pacífico. Profesor Adjunto del curso de Seminario de Integración en Estrategia Procesal y Litigación Oral en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.
  • Julio Olórtegui Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas
    Abogado. Asociado del estudio Bullard, Falla y Ezcurra. Internat Dechert LLP (Paris) – International Arbitration Department.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.006

Keywords:

International arbitration, arbitration award, procedure

Abstract

The figure of international arbitration is briefly defined as a method of conflict resolution in the international level, alternative to the Administration of Justice, emphasizing its neutrality, speed and confidentiality.
This article shows the new challenges faced by arbitrators, in terms of choice, length of process and efficiency in decision making. In addition, it proposes nine solutions to improve arbitration performance and abbreviate the process of taking decisions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-24

How to Cite

de la Jara, J. M., & Olórtegui, J. (2017). No pain, no gain: nine proposals to improve the future of international arbitration. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (71), 91–107. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.006

Issue

No. 71 (2017): Derecho procesal y arbitraje

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.