Review or not review, there is the dilemma: brief reflections on the impugnability of dispute boards’ decisions on the arbitral route

Authors

  • Gianpierre Valverde Grupo de Investigación de Derecho Administrativo

    Bachiller de la facultad de Derecho de la PUCP. Representante de la Comisión de Investigaciones en el Círculo de Derecho Administrativo de la PUCP. Voluntario en la Oficina Académica de Responsabilidad Social de la PUCP. Practicante en el BBVA Continental. Asistente de Docencia del curso de Derecho Administrativo 1 y 2. Investigador del Grupo de Investigación de Derecho Administrativo (GIDA).

  • Nadine Márquez Martin Consultores y Abogados S.C.R.L.

    Asistente legal en Tribunal Nacional de Controversias Hídricas en Autoridad Nacional del Agua. Asistente en Tribunal Nacional de Controversias Hídricas en Autoridad Nacional del Agua. Asistente legal en Martin Consultores y Abogados S.C.R.L.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.008

Keywords:

Arbitration, review, alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, dispute boards, public private partnership

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to highlight the probable contingencies that could arise as a result of the review of the decisions of the Dispute Boards in the arbitration. To achieve this, the structure of the article is arranged in such a way as to facilitate the understanding of the conclusions.
In that sense, first, the nature and function of the Dispute Boards is defined. The classes and advantages offered by these dispute resolution mechanisms are then indicated. Subsequently, the legal provision is analyzed in order to crumble its contents. The article ends with the analysis of the effects generated by reviewing the decisions of the Dispute Boards.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2017-04-24

How to Cite

Valverde, G., & Márquez, N. (2017). Review or not review, there is the dilemma: brief reflections on the impugnability of dispute boards’ decisions on the arbitral route. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (71), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.008