Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy

Authors

  • Alberto Cruces Burga Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado. Asesor Jurisdiccional del Tribunal Constitucional. Ex integrante del Gabinete de Asesores de la Presidencia del Poder Judicial. Profesor del Centro de Estudios Constitucionales del Tribunal Constitucional. Adjunto de docencia de cursos de Derecho Constitucional en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.012

Keywords:

Precedent, Constitutional Court, constitutional process, Substantially equal cases

Abstract

There are several judgments of the Constitutional Court that have marked important precedents.
These precedents contain a normative element, which determines the jurisdictional action in a great number of future acses.
In this article, the author develops how the judgment of the case Vásquez Romero has set a precedent of great importance regarding access to the Constitutional Court. The author will analyze the impact of this precedent on the grounds for rejection of the constitutional grievance remedies as they are substantially equal cases.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-04-24

How to Cite

Cruces Burga, A. (2017). Precedents without precedent: substantially equal cases as causal of rejection of the resources of constitutional remedy. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (71), 183–193. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201701.012

Issue

No. 71 (2017): Derecho procesal y arbitraje

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2018 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.