Hayek vs. Kelsen: the liberal foundation of the lex mercatoria

Authors

  • Fabio Núñez del Prado Universidad Carlos III de Madrid

    Abogado. Candidato a LL.M. por Yale University. Profesor de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas y la Universidad ESAN. Miembro de la asociación internacional Arbitration Academy, del Chartered Institute y del Club Español de Arbitraje. Asociado del área de arbitraje internacional de Uría Menéndez.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201702.007

Keywords:

Constructivism, Custom, sources of law, Hayek, Kelsen, Lex Mercatoria, law, spontaneous order, social order, planning, positivism, praxeology, risk

Abstract

How are commercial rules created? Should they be created in a constructivist way or are they created rather through a spontaneous order? Should Kelsen’s positivism prevail in commercial law? Should sectorial rules of risk allocation be included in a Civil Code?.The present article answers with effectiveness each one of these questions with the purpose of demonstrating that in commercial law the source par excellence should be the Lex Mercatoria.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-09-11

How to Cite

Núñez del Prado, F. (2017). Hayek vs. Kelsen: the liberal foundation of the lex mercatoria. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (72), 127–157. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201702.007

Issue

No. 72 (2017): Derecho Mercantil

Section

Derecho Mercantil

License

Copyright (c) 2017 TH?MIS-Revista de Derecho

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.