Debtor default in negative obligations: is it possible and appropriate to recognize it in the Peruvian Civil Code?

Authors

  • Aarón Vásquez Sotomayor Rivera Abogados

    Abogado. Asesor legal del Estudio Rivera Abogados, Piura, Perú.

    Contacto: aaronvasquez@riveralaw.pe.

  • Víctor Herrada Bazán Universidad de Piura

    Abogado. Máster en Derecho de la Empresa por la Universidad de Piura. Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Piura, Piura, Perú. Investigador adscrito al Departamento de Derecho Civil de la Universidad de Valladolid. Consultor del Estudio Rivera Abogados, Piura, Perú.

    Contacto: victor.herrada@udep.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201902.020

Keywords:

debtor default, negative obligations, Peruvian Civil Code, Draft Reform

Abstract

This paper analyzes the current debtor default regime contained in the Peruvian Civil Code, in order to determine whether, despite the many voices against it, its applicable and appropriate for negative obligations. Based on a brief review of the debtor default regime and the nature of negative obligations, the authors scrutinize from a phenomenological and functional approach the opposing opinions to make these institutions compatible.

Furthermore, based on an examination of the current status of the Peruvian Civil Code the authors argue that the application of the debtor default regime to negative obligations is not only possible but appropriate through an analog application of the current regime. Finally, they examine the regime proposed by the 2020 Draft Reform of the Peruvian Civil Code on the subject.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2019-08-31

How to Cite

Vásquez Sotomayor, A., & Herrada Bazán, V. (2019). Debtor default in negative obligations: is it possible and appropriate to recognize it in the Peruvian Civil Code?. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (76), 303–321. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.201902.020

Issue

Section

Misceláneas