Anti-suit Injunctions in Peruvian Arbitration

Authors

  • Mario Reggiardo Saavedra Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado. Master en Law and Economics (E.M.L.E.) por la Universität Hamburg. Profesor de las facultades de Derechode la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú y la Universidad del Pacífico. Socio de Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez (Lima, Perú). Contacto: mrs@prcp.com.pe

  • Álvaro Cuba Horna Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez

    Bachiller en Derecho por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Asistente legal en Payet, Rey, Cauvi, Pérez (Lima, Perú). Contacto: ach@prcp.com.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202001.012

Keywords:

Anti-suit injunctions, arbitral clause, jurisdictional monopoly, arbitration tribunal: parallel proceedings, triple identity test

Abstract

The Peruvian Arbitration Law was inspired by the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration. Both rules empower arbitration tribunals to issue anti-process or anti-suit injunctions. These measures classified as precautionary measures aim to protect the jurisdictional monopoly granted by the parties to the arbitral tribunal to address the risk of two parallel proceedings and two contradictory decisions being issued. However, despite appearing to be a useful remedy in arbitral material, it has certain questions that diminish its application.
In this article, the authors analyze such measures to address the questioning that limit its application to verify their efficiency and validity. It also assesses its requirements under international arbitration practice to corroborate whether they conform to the Peruvian regulatory framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Reggiardo Saavedra, M., & Cuba Horna, Álvaro. (2020). Anti-suit Injunctions in Peruvian Arbitration. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (77), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202001.012

Issue

Section

Actuaciones arbitrales