Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts

Authors

  • Katherine Waidhofer Ludeña Navarro Sologuren, Paredes, Gray Abogados

    Abogada. Master of Sciences (M.Sc.) in Construction Law and Dispute Resolution por el King’s College de Londres. Profesora de la Escuela de Posgrado de la Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas. Fellow del Chartered Institute of Arbitrators (Reino Unido). Abogada principal y cojefe del área de Disputas de Navarro Sologuren, Paredes, Gray Abogados (Lima, Perú). Contacto: kwaidhofer@npg.pe.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202001.020

Keywords:

Expert, professional liability, impartiality, construction arbitration, client, arbitration tribunal

Abstract

Disputes in the construction industry usually require the participation of a variety of qualified specialists who can assist the tribunal in understanding the high complexity of contract performance. In arbitration, the expert is generally appointed by one of the parties, although his opinion is solely obliged to the tribunal. Naturally, this relationship of perceived ambivalence between the expert, the party who appoints him and the tribunal can raise questions about the impartiality and independence of his opinion.
In this article, the author analyzes the international statutes and soft law that regulate the duties and professional responsibilities of experts in construction arbitration. In particular, she evaluates the treatment of the figure under Peruvian law and sheds light on whether the regulation provided by the Civil Code is sufficient. Furthermore, the author remarks the main measures adopted by arbitration tribunals to test the objectivity of expert opinions and the applicable standard of care for determining possible non-compliance by experts in the Peruvian legal system.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-12-21

How to Cite

Waidhofer Ludeña, K. (2020). Expert Opinion in Construction Disputes: Duties and Professional Liability of Experts. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (77), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202001.020

Issue

Section

Case management