The nature of the rules on contract interpretation

Authors

  • Hugo Forno Flórez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado. Profesor de Derecho Civil en la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) y en la Universidad de Lima. Ex miembro del Consejo de Arbitraje del Centro Internacional de Arbitraje de la Cámara de Comercio Americana del Perú (AMCHAM). Es árbitro del Centro de Arbitraje Nacional e Internacional de la Cámara de Comercio de Lima, de la Cámara de Comercio Americana del Perú y del Centro de Análisis y Resolución de Conflictos de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Ha participado como asesor de la Comisión de Reforma del Código Civil de 1984. Socio del Estudio Garrigues (Lima, Perú).
    Contacto: hugo.forno@garrigues.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202401.017

Keywords:

Operative clauses, Mandatory clauses, Contractual interpretation, Contracts, Comparative law

Abstract

Contract interpretation clauses are tools granted by the Civil Code. The discussion on the character they have (they could be mandatory or simple suggestions) has been a long doctrinal and even legislative debate. The author, by means of a historical and theoretical review of this institution around the world, but especially of the European legislations –which are the influence of ours–pronounces on the matter and argues that there is, in fact, a duality in the nature of these rules, since these categories, in the context they have been used, would not be mutually exclusive.
The importance of understanding these rules in this way lies in the fact that this is the only way to achieve a balance between legal certainty and contractual freedom.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-10-17

How to Cite

Forno Flórez, H. (2024). The nature of the rules on contract interpretation. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (85), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202401.017

Issue

Section

Libro VII: Fuente De Las Obligaciones