The apparent ‘substantive autonomy’ of money laundering and the necessary accreditation of the crime source

Authors

  • Daniel Santiago Loli Ausejo Benites, Vargas & Ugaz Abogados https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9337-9876

    Abogado. Asistente del curso de Derecho Penal Económico en la Facultad de Derecho de la Universidad de Lima (ULI-MA). Actualmente, cursa el Master de Derecho Penal y Procesal Penal en la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, así como un Posgrado de Compliance por la misma casa de estudios. Asociado en Benites, Vargas & Ugaz Abogados (Lima, Perú).
    Contacto: dloli@bvu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202402.010

Keywords:

Money laundering, Predicate offense, Procedural autonomy, Substantive autonomy, Source crime

Abstract

The article 10 of the Legislative Decree 1106 acknowledges the autonomy of the crime of money laundering. A sector of legal doctrine interprets this autonomy as ‘substantive autonomy’, meaning that the predicate offense is not included within the definition of the crime. In response to this stance, the author aims to emphasize the significance of the illicit origin as an element of the objective components of the crime of money laundering.
Therefore, the author will reinforce the necessity of identifying and proving the predicate offense within the criminal process to properly establish the crime of money laundering.
Throughout the text, the author will discuss and interpret relevant legal provisions as well as national jurisprudence to conclude that the autonomy enshrined in Article 10 is limited strictly to procedural autonomy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Loli Ausejo, D. S. (2024). The apparent ‘substantive autonomy’ of money laundering and the necessary accreditation of the crime source. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (86), 189–204. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202402.010

Issue

Section

Derecho Penal Económico