Law or jurisprudence? Considerations on determining the suspension period of the prescription of criminal prosecution

Authors

  • Raúl Pariona Arana Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8273-3627

    Abogado. Doctor en Derecho por la Universidad Ludwig Maximilian de Múnich (LMU). Profesor de Derecho Penal en la Facultad de Derecho de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP) y la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos (UNMSM). Socio Fundador del Estudio Pariona Abogados.
    Contacto: rpariona@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202402.013

Keywords:

Principle of criminal legality, Prescription of criminal prosecution, Suspension of prescription, Constitutional review, Jurisprudence

Abstract

The article addresses the problem of determining the suspension period of the prescription of criminal prosecution. It analyzes its legal regulation, its subsequent determination by Law 31751, and the impact of Plenary Agreement 05-2023/CIJ-112.
After discussing the scope of the principle of legality, the separation of powers, and the constitutional review of criminal law, de lege lata, is defined that in our legal system, Law 31751 establishes the limit of the suspension period of the prescription. Finally, de lege ferenda, a legislative reform is proposed that does not assign suspensive effects to the act of formalizing the preparatory investigation and that the suspension period lasts as long as it takes to resolve the impeding cause.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2024-12-27

How to Cite

Pariona Arana, R. (2024). Law or jurisprudence? Considerations on determining the suspension period of the prescription of criminal prosecution. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (86), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202402.013

Issue

Section

Derecho Procesal Penal