Unconstitutionality and tax avoidance: amazonian self-sufficiency requirements and the failure of the necessity test under the BEPS framework

Authors

  • Pierella Chipana Paz Columbia University https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2950-5375

    Abogada. Especialización en Derecho Corporativo y Financiero por Columbia University. Actualmente se desempeña en el área de Estrategia Tributaria de Alicorp.
    Contacto: pchipanapaz@gmail.com

  • Renzo Mayor Mayor Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3310-3204

    Abogado. Segunda Especialidad en Derecho Procesal por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Jefe de Prácticas del curso Introducción a las Ciencias Jurídicas en la PUCP.
    Contacto: rkmayor@gmail.com

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202601.005

Keywords:

Amazon region, Tax avoidance, Tax incentives, Territoriality, Proportionality

Abstract

The Amazon Regime, in its functional degeneration, has facilitated the erosion of the tax base; however, the imposition of a 100% territoriality requirement constitutes a disproportionate measure.

While the Bill seeks to address tax avoidance and the regressivity of tax expenditures by demanding productive self-sufficiency in a region characterized by geographic isolation and infrastructural deficiencies –factors expressly acknowledged in the legislative initiative itself–, the rule ultimately penalizes legitimate investment and deepens extra-regional economic disarticulation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Chipana Paz, P., & Mayor Mayor, R. (2026). Unconstitutionality and tax avoidance: amazonian self-sufficiency requirements and the failure of the necessity test under the BEPS framework. THEMIS Revista De Derecho, (89), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.18800/themis.202601.005

Issue

Section

Tributación internacional y fiscalidad global