Before digital, return to the sources: communicators, media and discourse

  • Eduardo Villanueva Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Doctor en Ciencia Política y Gobierno por la PUCP; profesor
    asociado del Departamento de Comunicaciones de esa
    universidad. Ha publicado “Technological Illusions and
    Educational Resistances: The Public Discourse about OLPC
    in Peru and Its Policy Failure” (Handbook of Research on
    Comparative Approaches to the Digital Age Revolution
    in Europe and the Americas. IGI Global, 2015: 428-443).
    Es coordinador del Grupo de Trabajo 10 de la Asociación
    Latinoamericana de Investigadores de la Comunicación.

Keywords: Internet studies, Professional formation in communications, Teaching communication

Abstract

With mounting criticisms on the relevance of communication studies, both to train future professionals as well as for academic enquiry, and with the influx of changes coming from society’s digital transformations, a review of the different interaction between the professional and technical aspects that constitute the field allow for elucidation of the actual specificity of the discipline or set of disciplines that are grouped under the banner of “communication sciences” or “media studies”. This essay strives to propose an understanding of these interactions through an specific metaphor, and then how this understanding can be used to facilitate academic thinking and professional undertakings cross-dialog.

References

Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale.

Cardoso, G. (2008). From mass to networked communication: Communicational models and the informational society. International Journal of Communication, 2, pp. 587-630.

Carr, J. (2012). No laughing matter: the power of cyberspace to subvert conventional media gatekeepers. International Journal of Communication, 6, pp. 2825-2845.

Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, pp. 773-787.

Curran, J. (2013). Mickey Mouse squeaks back: defending media studies; Keynote address to the MeCCSA conference in Derry 2013. Recuperado de http://www.meccsa.org.uk/ news/mickey-mouse-squeaks-back-defending-media-studies/

Daly, K. (2010). Cinema 3.0: the interactive-image. Cinema Journal, 50(1), pp. 81-98.

Denning, M. (1991). The end of mass culture. En J. Naremore y P. Brantliger (Eds.), Modernity and mass culture (pp. 253-268). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Dutton, W. (2008). The fifth estate, democratic social accountability through the emerging network of networks. Oxford: OII.

Ess, C. (2015) [Air-L] a fourth age of Internet studies? What glues Internet studies together? Recuperado de http://listserv.aoir.org/pipermail/air-l-aoir.org/2015-May/031348.html

Finberg, H. I. y Klinger, L. (2014). Core skills for the future of journalism. Poynter Institute.

Fuchs, C. (2009). Some reflections on Manuel Castells’ Book “Communication Power”. tripleC, 7(1), pp. 94-108.

García Canclini, N. (2001). Culturas híbridas: estrategias para entrar y salir de la modernidad. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

Gauntlett, D. (2007). Media studies 2.0. New introduction, 2011. Recuperado de http://www. theory.org.uk/mediastudies2.htm

Gutiérrez Vidrio, S. (2001). Comunicación y cultura. La corriente crítica latinoamericana. Anuario 2000. México: UAM, pp. 223-233. Recuperado de http://148.206.107.15/biblioteca_digital/capitulos/21-541qip.pdf

Hills, M. (2002). Fan cultures. Londres: Routledge.

Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report on an hypothesis.The Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), pp. 61-78. Recuperado de http://www.jstor. org/stable/2746790.

Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., y Haas, H. (1973). On the use of the mass media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, pp. 167-181.

Kwon, E. S. y Sung, Y. (2013). Follow me! Global marketers’ Twitter use. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 12(1), pp. 4-16.

Literat, I. (2012). The work of art in the age of mediated participation: crowdsourced art and collective creativity. International Journal of Communication, 6, pp. 2962-2984.

Margetts, H. (2013). The Internet and democracy. En W. H. Dutton (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (pp. 421-437). Oxford University Press.

Marques de Melo, J. (1999). Paradigmas de escuelas latinoamericanas de comunicación. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 19. Recuperado de http://www.ull.es/ publicaciones/latina/a1999fjl/73meloe.htm

Martínez Nicolás, M. (2009). La investigación sobre comunicación en España. Evolución histórica y retos actuales. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 64. Recuperado de http://www.ull.es/publicaciones/latina/09/art/01_800_01_investigacion/Manuel_Martinez_Nicolas.html.

Mattoni, A. y Treré, E. (2014). Media practices, mediation processes, and mediatization in the study of social movements. Communication Theory, 24(3), pp. 252-271.

McChesney, R. W. (2004). The problem of the media: U.S. communication politics in the 21st century. Nueva York: Monthly Review Press.

Miller, T. (2009?). A future for media studies: cultural labour, cultural relations, cultural politics. Recuperado de http://www.tobymiller.org/images/Media%20Studies/Media%20 Studies-Sub.%20Cat-Gaming/A%20future%20for%20media%20studies.pdf

Peters, J. D. (1999). Speaking into the air: a history of the idea of communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Scolari, C. (2009). Transmedia storytelling: implicit consumers, narrative worlds and branding in contemporary media production. International Journal of Communication, 3, pp. 588-606.

Stohl, C. (2014). Crowds, clouds, and community. Presidential address, ICA 2013. Journal of Communication, 64(1), pp. 1-19.

Vattimo, G. (1990). La sociedad transparente. Barcelona: Paidós.

Wolton, D. (1999). Internet, et après? Une théorie critique des nouveaux medias. París: Flammarion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
How to Cite
Villanueva, E. (2016). Before digital, return to the sources: communicators, media and discourse. Conexión, (5), 8-23. https://doi.org/10.18800/conexion.201601.001