Political circuits: institutional changes and new mobilizers of the student political organization in Peru

Authors

  • Noelia Chávez Angeles Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Noelia Chávez es licenciada en Sociología por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP).
    Fue jefa de Comunicaciones de la Superintendencia Nacional de Educación Superior Universitaria (Sunedu). Ha sido docente y predocente de la PUCP, ha investigado sobre educación superior universitaria, movimientos sociales y regímenes políticos subnacionales.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.201602.002

Keywords:

student movement, public university, university government, clientelism, party, substitutes

Abstract

Peru does not have an articulated and organized student movement that promote clear agendas to improve the quality of higher education. Still, students compete in elections for seats at their university’s governing bodies. This is the case of the National University of Peruvian Amazon (UNAP), where student’s political groups have increased in recent years without a clear agenda about university development. This article explores this paradox describing the new mobilizers for students’ organizations.
Firstly, the findings suggest that university’s governing bodies operate under a clientelistic logic between students and authorities. However, at the same time some students have built a new interest in local and regional politics as a result of the Peruvian decentralization process. Therefore, student organizations are also functioning as political operators and supporters of the regional movements.
The “big politics” continue to intervene in “petty politics”, and vice versa, turning the university into a relevant arena and students into key actors to understand subnational politics and the functioning of “democracies without parties”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2016-03-12

How to Cite

Chávez Angeles, N. (2016). Political circuits: institutional changes and new mobilizers of the student political organization in Peru. Debates En Sociología, (43), 31–61. https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.201602.002

Issue

Section

Artículos