Constitutionalize the law or politicize the Constitution? Threats, risks and dangers in contemporary constitutionalism

Authors

  • Eduardo Hernando Nieto Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9464-7224

    Doctor en Filosofía por la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, máster en Teoría Social y Política por la Universidad de East Anglia (Inglaterra). Profesor ordinario del Departamento de Derecho de la PUCP. Profesor en el Postgrado de Derecho de la PUCP, la UNMSM, USMP, y en el pregrado de la UPC. Profesor y consultor de la Academia de la Magistratura. Consultor del PMSJ, Banco Mundial. Correo electrónico: ehernan@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.002

Keywords:

contemporary constitutionalism, classic constitutionalism, liberal and democratic values

Abstract

Since the beginning of modernity, the use of rhetoric have prevailed; that is, the technique of perverting the language giving concepts different meanings presuming nothing have changed when in fact, it has occurred. The same thing happens with the concept of Constitution, it has been completelymodified its sense from the progress of individual rights moral. In this article the intention is to demonstrate the nature of this change and at the same time claim on the «old constitutionalism» validity and also the rule of law and political will beginning on a critical reading of contemporary constitutionalism and considering its tendency to constitutionalize or materialize the law, ironically risking the same values intended to defend.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-11-21

How to Cite

Hernando Nieto, E. (2013). Constitutionalize the law or politicize the Constitution? Threats, risks and dangers in contemporary constitutionalism. Derecho PUCP, (71), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.002