Constitutionalization of international investment law: Indirect expropriation cases, fair and equitable treatment

Authors

  • César Higa Silva Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9842-2150

    Magíster en Teoría de la Argumentación. Profesor de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Correo electrónico: chiga@pucp.edu.pe

  • Víctor Saco Chung Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3616-9786

    Magíster en Derecho Internacional y Derecho Europeo. Profesor de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Correo electrónico: victor.saco@pucp.edu.pe

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.009

Keywords:

international investments law, constitutionalization, fair and equitable treatment, indirect expropriation, rule of law, international law of human rights, consistency, consistent interpretation, investment climate

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact of international investment law rules in the Economic Constitutional Law, especially those included in investment chapters of Peruvian’s Free Trade Treaties. In particular, it is expected to demonstrate the following (i) International Investment Law is part of Peruvian Legal System; (ii) provisions of these laws are mandatory and should be applied domestically; and (iii) interpretation and implementation of this legal right should be executed consistently with domestic legal system and Peruvian international obligations. This agreed Interpretation between Investment Law and Economic Constitution will have a positive effect in rationalization of public entities actions avoiding abuses and maltreatment to investors, in order to improve investment climate as a key element forachieving country’s sustainable development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2013-11-21

How to Cite

Higa Silva, C., & Saco Chung, V. (2013). Constitutionalization of international investment law: Indirect expropriation cases, fair and equitable treatment. Derecho PUCP, (71), 231–256. https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.009