The practice of judicial review in China
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201302.021Keywords:
constitutional control, constitutional rights, democracyAbstract
The author classifies constitutional control models in the world inthree groups: Constitutional Court model, judicial revision and parliamentary control. China’s model is the last one. Then, underlines, two main goals of constitutional control: human rights protection and constitutional control of the legal system. Finally, suggests a debate about which body should bein charge of the constitutional control, whether that important work shall continue under the National People’s Congress, become a non legislative body or if it shall stay in charge of China’s Superior Court.Downloads
References
Dietze, Gottfried (1956). «Unconstitutional Constitutional Norms? Constitutional Development in Postwar Germany». Virginia Law Review, 42 (enero, 1956), pp. 1-22.
Donald P. Kommers y Russell A. Miller (1989). The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany. Durham: Duke University Press, p. 541.
Ely, John Hart (1980). Democracy an Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kellogg, E. «¿La muerte del litigio constitucional en China?». China Brief, 9.
Wang, Zhengmin. Constitutional Conflict and the Role of the National People’s Congress. En: http://www.fljs.org/sites/www.fljs.org/files/publications/Zhenmin%25231%2523.pdf
William J. Nardini (1999). «Passive Activism and the Limits of Judicial Self-Restraint: Lessons for America from the Italian Constitutional Court». Seton Hall Law Review, 30 , pp. 1-63.
Zedong, Mao. On New Democratic Constitutionalism.
Zhu, Guobin (2010) . «Constitutional Review in China: An Unaccomplished Project or a Mirage?». Suffolk University Law Review, XLIII , p. 625.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Derecho PUCP
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
