Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law
Keywords:
, recommendations, Horizontal collusion, Vertical collusion, Cartels - Anticompetitive practices, Antitrust, Free competition, INDECOPIAbstract
On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a horizontal agreement (cartel). It also analyzes in which instances said application has been inaccurate and the issues surrounding it. Finally, the author illustrates the complexity of framing recommendations as vertical agreements in the absence of “collusion between two or more parties”
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2015-11-23
How to Cite
Quintana Sánchez, E. (2015). Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(51), 46–63. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15651
Issue
Section
Artículos
License
Copyright (c) 2016 IUS ET VERITAS

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

.png)
.png)