Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law

Authors

  • Eduardo Quintana Sánchez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú

    Abogado por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Master en Regulación de Servicios Públicos de la London School of Economics and Political Science. Profesor de la Facultad de Derecho y de la Maestría en Derecho de la Empresa de la PUCP. Socio de Bullard, Falla, Ezcurra Abogados. equintana@bullardabogados.pe

Keywords:

, recommendations, Horizontal collusion, Vertical collusion, Cartels - Anticompetitive practices, Antitrust, Free competition, INDECOPI

Abstract

On this paper, the author disserts on the notion of recommendations as a method of collusion. First, he approaches it based on comparative law (Europe and Latin-America) and precedent case law from INDECOPI, followed by defining how the term is (and should be) understood in Peruvian regulations as a horizontal agreement (cartel). It also analyzes in which instances said application has been inaccurate and the issues surrounding it. Finally, the author illustrates the complexity of framing recommendations as vertical agreements in the absence of “collusion between two or more parties”

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2015-11-23

How to Cite

Quintana Sánchez, E. (2015). Hazards on sanctioning the Recommendations as an anti-competitive practice in the Peruvian Law. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(51), 46–63. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15651

Issue

Section

Artículos