The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Morón Urbina Universidad San Martín de Porres

    Abogado por la Universidad San Martín de Porres. Maestría en Derecho Constitucional por la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú (PUCP). Directivo de la Asociación Peruana de Derecho Administrativo, miembro de la Sociedad Peruana de Derecho de la Construcción y miembro del Foro Iberoamericano de Derecho Administrativo. Profesor en diversos cursos de Derecho Administrativo a nivel de pregrado y postgrado en la Facultad de Derecho de la PUCP, Universidad ESAN, Universidad de Piura y Universidad San Martin de Porres. Socio Principal del Estudio Echecopar.

Keywords:

Process, Harmfulness Litigation, Administrative Scrutiny, Due Process of Law, Legality, Public Interest, Self- Enforcement of Public Law

Abstract

This article explains the contentious process of harmfulness. Thus, the author mentions that the foundation of the process of harmfulness has been on our right the survival of the Administrative security of the legality and the public interest but
limiting the self-enforcement, the requirement of belief in authority to pursue the annulment of an administrative act and to ensure the due process of law is being administered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-23

How to Cite

Morón Urbina, J. C. (2015). The contentious process of declaration of detrimental to public interest: Fourteen years after its incorporation in Peruvian law. IUS ET VERITAS, 24(51), 224–246. Retrieved from https://revistas.pucp.edu.pe/index.php/iusetveritas/article/view/15660

Issue

No. 51 (2015)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2016 IUS ET VERITAS

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.